Michael Wolff über Beweise für vollkommene Syllogismen bei Aristoteles

The paper rejects Michael Wolff's claim that Aristotle offers proofs for the validity of his perfect syllogisms.
Keywords perfect syllogism
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 13,593
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Theodor Ebert (1995). Was Ist Ein Vollkommener Syllogismus des Aristoteles? Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 77 (3):221-247.
Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Michael Wolff (2010). Vollkommene Syllogismen und reine Vernunftschlüsse: Aristoteles und Kant. Eine Stellungnahme zu Theodor Eberts Gegeneinwänden. Teil 2. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 41 (2):359 - 371.
Theodor Ebert (1980). Warum fehlt bei Aristoteles die 4. Figur? Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 62 (1):13-31.
Otfried Höffe (1976). Grundaussagen über den Menschen bei Aristoteles. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 30 (2):227 - 245.
Wolfgang Detel (1987). Eine Notiz über vollkommene Syllogismen bei Aristoteles. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 69 (2):129-139.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

5 ( #264,553 of 1,692,464 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #184,284 of 1,692,464 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.