David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Environmental Ethics 18 (1):3-18 (1996)
While the activity of imagination is present in much writing about environmental ethics, little direct attention has been given to clarifying its role. Both its significant presence and provocative theoretical work showing the central role of imagination in ethics suggest a need for discussion of its contributions. Environmental ethicists especially should attend to imagination because of the pervasive influence of metaphorical constructs of nature and because imaginative work is required to even partially envision the perspective of a nonhuman being. Without clear awareness of the limits of contemporary Western metaphoric constructs of nature, environmental ethicists may overlook or even contribute to the cultural extinction of ideas of nature present in the imaginative visions of indigenous cultures. In this article, I briefly review the reasons why the dominant Western philosophical tradition ranks imagination below the power of abstract reasoning, survey contemporary ideas about the role of imagination in ethics, and consider the implications of these ideas for environmental ethics. The work of imaginative empathy in constructing what might be the experience of nonhuman beings, the role of diverse metaphors and symbols in understanding nature, and the process of envisioning the possible future are developed as three central contributions of imagination to environmental ethics. Imaginative work is not peripheral, butcomplementary to the work of reason in shaping an environmental ethic
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Marti Kheel (1996). The Killing Game: An Ecofeminist Critique of Hunting. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 23 (1):30-44.
Similar books and articles
Midori Kagawa-Fox (2010). Environmental Ethics From the Japanese Perspective. Ethics, Place and Environment 13 (1):57 – 73.
Meg Holden (2001). Phenomenology Versus Pragmatism. Environmental Ethics 23 (1):37-56.
Derek Matravers (2003). Fictional Assent and the (so-Called) `Puzzle of Imaginative Resistance'. In Matthew Kieran & Dominic McIver Lopes (eds.), Imagination, Philosophy, and the Arts. Routledge 91-106.
Robert Hull (2005). All About EVE: A Report on Environmental Virtue Ethics Today. Ethics and the Environment 10 (1):89-110.
Anna L. Peterson (2006). Toward a Materialist Environmental Ethic. Environmental Ethics 28 (4):375-393.
R. King (1999). Narrative, Imagination, and the Search for Intelligibility in Environmental Ethics. Ethics and the Environment 4 (1):23-38.
Mark Coeckelbergh (2007). Imagination and Principles: An Essay on the Role of Imagination in Moral Reasoning. Palgrave Macmillan.
Steven Fesmire (2010). Ecological Imagination. Environmental Ethics 32 (2):183-203.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #163,835 of 1,724,891 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #167,175 of 1,724,891 )
How can I increase my downloads?