International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (1):39-56 (2010)
|Abstract||Thomas Aquinas argues that matter is informed by a rational soul to compose a human person. But a person may survive her body’s death since a rational soul is able to exist and function without matter. This leads to the typical characterization of Aquinas as a dualist. Thomistic dualism, however, is distinct from both Platonic dualism and various accounts of substance dualism offered by philosophers such as Richard Swinburne. For both Plato and Swinburne, a person is identical to an immaterial soul that is contingently related to a human body. For Aquinas, a human person is composed of her soul and the matter it informs, but is not identical to either metaphysical component. I explicate Thomistic dualism while critically analyzing Swinburne’s account. I conclude that Aquinas’s account has theresources to address a central issue that arises for substance dualism|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Christina Van Dyke (2009). Not Properly a Person. Faith and Philosophy 26 (2):186-204.
Joungbin Lim (2010). Dualism, Physicalism, and the Passion of the Christ. Proceedings of the XXII World Congress of Philosophy 45:185-197.
Eleonore Stump (1995). Non-Cartesian Substance Dualism and Materialism Without Reductionism. Faith and Philosophy 12 (4):505-531.
William P. Alston & Thomas W. Smythe (1994). Swinburne's Argument for Dualism. Faith and Philosophy 11 (1):127-33.
Sarah Broadie (2001). Soul and Body in Plato and Descartes. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (3):295–308.
M. Pakaluk (2003). Degrees of Separation in the "Phaedo". Phronesis 48 (2):89 - 115.
Michael Pakaluk (2003). Degrees of Separation in the Phaedo. Phronesis 48 (2):89-115.
Patrick Toner (2012). St. Thomas Aquinas on the Problem of Too Many Thinkers. The Modern Schoolman 89 (3-4):209-222.
Richard Swinburne (1996). Dualism Intact. Faith and Philosophy 13 (1):68 - 77.
Jason T. Eberl (2005). Aquinas's Account of Human Embryogenesis and Recent Interpretations. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (4):379 – 394.
Eleonore Stump & Norman Kretzmann (1996). An Objection to Swinburne's Argument for Dualism. Faith and Philosophy 13 (3):405-412.
William Lycan (2009). Giving Dualism its Due. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (4):551-563.
David S. Oderberg (2005). Hylemorphic Dualism. Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (2):70-99.
Suzette M. Evans (1981). Separable Souls: A Defense of Minimal Dualism. Southern Journal of Philosophy 19 (3):313-332.
Kent Reames (1999). A Response to Swinburne's Latest Defense of the Argument For Dualism. Faith and Philosophy 16 (1):90-97.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads20 ( #68,206 of 722,787 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,644 of 722,787 )
How can I increase my downloads?