Nurses' attitudes towards artificial food or fluid administration in patients with dementia and in terminally ill patients: a review of the literature [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (6):431-436 (2008)
Objective: Although nurses have an important role in the care process surrounding artificial food or fluid administration in patients with dementia or in terminally ill patients, little is known about their attitudes towards this issue. The purpose of this study was to thoroughly examine nurses’ attitudes by means of a literature review.Method: An extensive systematic search of the electronic databases PubMed, Cinahl, PsycINFO, The Cochrane Library, FRANCIS, Philosopher’s Index and Social Sciences Citation Index was conducted to identify pertinent articles published from January 1990 to January 2007.Findings: Nurses’ arguments for or against could be categorised as ethical-legal, clinical or social-professional. The most important arguments explicitly for artificial food and fluid administration in patients with dementia or in terminally ill patients were sanctity of life, considering artificial food and fluid administration as basic nursing care, and giving reliable nutrition, hydration or medication. An explicit counter-argument was the high cost of treatment. Arguments used by opponents and proponents were quality of life and dignified death. The arguments were not strikingly different for the two patient populations. It turned out that the nurses’ ethical arguments remarkably reflected the current ethical debate. But some of their clinical presuppositions contradicted current clinical evidence.Conclusion: The interaction between clinical facts and ethical reflections makes the findings of this review extremely relevant for clinical ethics. A large need exists to clearly communicate to nurses the latest clinical evidence and the main results of ongoing ethical debates
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Sami Alsolamy (2014). Islamic Views on Artificial Nutrition and Hydration in Terminally Ill Patients. Bioethics 28 (2):96-99.
Els Bryon, Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé & Chris Gastmans (2011). 'Because We See Them Naked' – Nurses' Experiences in Caring for Hospitalized Patients with Dementia: Considering Artificial Nutrition or Hydration (Anh). Bioethics 26 (6):285-295.
Kay Norton (2011). How Music-Inspired Weeping Can Help Terminally Ill Patients. Journal of Medical Humanities 32 (3):231-243.
Allan S. Brett (2002). Problems in Caring for Critically and Terminally Ill Patients: Perspectives of Physicians and Nurses. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 14 (2):132-147.
Y. M. Barilan (2004). Is the Clock Ticking for Terminally Ill Patients in Israel? Preliminary Comment on a Proposal for a Bill of Rights for the Terminally Ill. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (4):353-357.
Udo Schüklenk & Christopher Lowry (2009). Terminal Illness and Access to Phase 1 Experimental Agents, Surgeries and Devices: Reviewing the Ethical Arguments. British Medical Bulletin 89 (1):7-22.
G. M. Craig (1996). On Withholding Artificial Hydration and Nutrition From Terminally Ill Sedated Patients. The Debate Continues. Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (3):147-153.
R. Gillon (1994). Palliative Care Ethics: Non-Provision of Artificial Nutrition and Hydration to Terminally Ill Sedated Patients. Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (3):131-187.
Sandra E. Black, Metacognitive Judgment and Denial of Deﬁcit: Evidence From Frontotemporal Dementia.
Erika Kleiderman, Denise Avard, Lee Black, Zuanel Diaz, Caroline Rousseau & Bartha Knoppers (2012). Recruiting Terminally Ill Patients Into Non-Therapeutic Oncology Studies: Views of Health Professionals. [REVIEW] BMC Medical Ethics 13 (1):33-.
L. B. Cebik (1980). The Significance of Death for the Living. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 1 (1):67-83.
Arthur R. Derse (1999). Making Decisions About Life-Sustaining Medical Treatment in Patients with Dementia. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (1):55-67.
Eve Garrard & Anthony Wrigley (2009). Hope and Terminal Illness: False Hope Versus Absolute Hope. Clinical Ethics 4 (1):38-43.
G. T. Laurie (2004). Editorial Comment on Y M Barilan's 'Is the Clock Ticking for the Terminally Ill Patients in Israel?'. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (4):358-358.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads11 ( #313,010 of 1,907,930 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #461,907 of 1,907,930 )
How can I increase my downloads?