Textual Appropriation in Engineering Master's Theses: A Preliminary Study
Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):469-483 (2011)
| Abstract | In the thesis literature review, an engineering graduate student is expected to place original research in the context of previous work by other researchers. However, for some students, particularly those for whom English is a second language, the literature review may be a mixture of original writing and verbatim source text appropriated without quotations. Such problematic use of source material leaves students vulnerable to an accusation of plagiarism, which carries severe consequences. Is such textual appropriation common in engineering master’s writing? Furthermore, what, if anything, can be concluded when two texts have been found to have textual material in common? Do existing definitions of plagiarism provide a sufficient framework for determining if an instance of copying is transgressive or not? In a preliminary attempt to answer these questions, text strings from a random sample of 100 engineering master’s theses from the ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database were searched for appropriated verbatim source text using the Google search engine. The results suggest that textual borrowing may indeed be a common feature of the master’s engineering literature review, raising questions about the ability of graduate students to synthesize the literature. The study also illustrates the difficulties of making a determination of plagiarism based on simple textual similarity. A context-specific approach is recommended when dealing with any instance of apparent copying | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesCharles J. Abaté (2011). Should Engineering Ethics Be Taught? Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):583-596.
Eddie Conlon & Henk Zandvoort (forthcoming). Broadening Ethics Teaching in Engineering: Beyond the Individualistic Approach. Science and Engineering Ethics.
William R. Wilson (forthcoming). Using the Chernobyl Incident to Teach Engineering Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics.
Robert E. McGinn (2003). “Mind the Gaps”: An Empirical Approach to Engineering Ethics, 1997–2001. Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (4):517-542.
Philip G. Cohen (ed.) (1997). Texts and Textuality: Textual Instability, Theory, and Interpretation. Garland Pub..
Lidija Bilic-Zulle, Josip Azman, Vedran Frkovic & Mladen Petrovecki (2008). Is There an Effective Approach to Deterring Students From Plagiarizing? Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (1).
Jessica Li & Shengli Fu (2012). A Systematic Approach to Engineering Ethics Education. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2):339-349.
Miguel Roig (2001). Plagiarism and Paraphrasing Criteria of College and University Professors. Ethics and Behavior 11 (3):307 – 323.
Tracey Bretag & Saadia Mahmud (2009). Self-Plagiarism or Appropriate Textual Re-Use? Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (3).
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2010-06-09Total downloads1 ( #277,212 of 556,807 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
