International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 1 (1):161 - 177 (2008)
|Abstract||This commentary was submitted to the World Medical Association on behalf of the International Network on Feminist Approaches to Bioethics. Our submission included (1) a description of feminist research ethics, (2) suggestions for specific revisions to the Declaration, and (3) elements found in other international research ethics codes that are important from a feminist perspective. Our goals were to encourage the WMA to craft a declaration that: (1) conceptualizes issues of vulnerability in richer and more nuanced ways, (2) resists the influence of profit motives, and (3) extends the scope of responsibility for ethical research more broadly.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ruth Macklin (2001). After Helsinki: Unresolved Issues in International Research. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (1):17-36.
Simon Woods & Pauline Mccormack (2013). Disputing the Ethics of Research: The Challenge From Bioethics and Patient Activism to the Interpretation of the Declaration of Helsinki in Clinical Trials. Bioethics 27 (5):243-250.
John R. Williams (2005). The Ethics Activities of the World Medical Association. Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (1).
Randolph Smoak (2004). Placebo: Its Action and Place in Health Research Today. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1).
Cheryl Coxmacpherson (2004). Research Sponsors Duties to Developing World Host Nations: The Ongoing Wma Discussion of Possible Revisions to the 2000 Declaration of Helsinki (Paragraph 30). [REVIEW] Developing World Bioethics 4 (2):173–175.
Cheryl Cox Macpherson (2004). Research Sponsors Duties to Developing World Host Nations: The Ongoing Wma Discussion of Possible Revisions to the 2000 Declaration of Helsinki (Paragraph 30). [REVIEW] Developing World Bioethics 4 (2):173-175.
Nathan Nobis (2005). Feminist Ethics Without Feminist Ethical Theory (Or, More Generally, “Φ Ethics Without Φ Ethical Theory”). Journal of Philosophical Research 30 (Supplement):213-225.
Mary C. Rawlinson (2012). Women and Special Vulnerability: Commentary "On the Principle of Respect for Human Vulnerability and Personal Integrity," UNESCO, International Bioethics Committee Report. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 5 (2):174-179.
L. A. Eckenwiler, C. Ells, D. Feinholz & T. Schonfeld (2008). Hopes for Helsinki: Reconsidering "Vulnerability". Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (10):765-766.
Donald Evans (2012). Commentary on the Unesco Ibc Report on Respect for Vulnerability and Personal Integrity: (Article 8 of the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights). International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 5 (2):170-173.
Bozidar Vrhovac (2004). Placebo and the Helsinki Declaration — What to Do? Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1).
Robyn Bluhm (2011). Feminist Bioethics: At the Center, on the Margins. [REVIEW] International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 4 (2):154-159.
Lisa H. Schwartzman (2005). A Feminist Critique of Nussbaum's Liberalism : Towards an Alternative Feminist Methodology. In Barbara S. Andrew, Jean Clare Keller & Lisa H. Schwartzman (eds.), Feminist Interventions in Ethics and Politics: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Norah Martin (2001). Feminist Bioethics and Psychiatry. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (4):431 – 441.
R. K. Lie (2004). The Standard of Care Debate: The Declaration of Helsinki Versus the International Consensus Opinion. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (2):190-193.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads2 ( #245,904 of 722,774 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?