Ethics and International Affairs 24 (4):367-393 (2010)
|Abstract||The article critically examines domestic political concerns about the competitive disadvantages and possible carbon leakage arising from the introduction of domestic emission trading legislation and the fairness of applying carbon equalization measures at the border as a response to these concerns. I argue that the border adjustment measures proposed in the emissions trading bills that have been presented to Congress amount to an evasion of the U.S.'s leadership responsibilities under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). I also show how the “level commercial playing field” justification for border measures that has dominated U.S. domestic debates is narrow and lopsided because it focuses only on the competitive disadvantages and direct carbon leakage that may flow from climate regulation while ignoring general shifts in the production and consumption of emissions in the global economy, which have enabled the outsourcing of emission to developing countries. The UNFCC production-based method of emissions accounting enables Northern consumers to enjoy the benefit of cheaper imports from Southern producers and to attribute the emissions associated with this consumption to the South. I argue that it is possible to design fair border measures that address carbon leakage, are consistent with the leadership responsibilities of developed countries, do not penalize developing countries, and ensure that consumers take some responsibility for the emissions outsourced to developing countries|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David Wheeler, Moving Toward a Consensus on Climate Policy: The Essential Role of Global Public Disclosure.
Simon Caney & Cameron Hepburn (2011). Carbon Trading: Unethical, Unjust and Ineffective? Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 69:201-234.
Edna Sussman, Energy Charter Treaty's Investor Protection Provisions: Potential to Foster Solutions to Global Warming and Promote Sustainable Development.
Stephen J. DeCanio (1992). Carbon Rights and Economic Development. Critical Review 6 (2-3):389-410.
Malgorzata Kurjanska & Mathias Risse (2008). Fairness in Trade II: Export Subsidies and the Fair Trade Movement. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (1):29-56.
Monica Aufrecht (2011). Climate Change and Structural Emissions. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (2):201-213.
Aaron Maltais (2013). Radically Non-Ideal Climate Politics and the Obligation to at Least Vote Green. Environmental Values 22 (5):589-608.
Anne Schwenkenbecher (2012). Is There an Obligation to Reduce One’s Individual Carbon Footprint? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy.
Added to index2010-12-17
Total downloads11 ( #107,366 of 722,780 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,780 )
How can I increase my downloads?