David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Ai 20:261-268 (2008)
The three commentaries of Van Orden, Spivey and Anderson, and Dietrich (with Markman’s as a backdrop) form a tableau that reminds me of a fable by Ivan Andreevich Krylov (1769 - 1844), in which a swan, a pike, and a crawﬁsh undertake jointly to move a cart laden with goods. What transpires then is not unexpected: the swan strives skyward, the pike pulls toward the river, and the crawﬁsh scrambles backward. The call for papers for the present ecumenically minded special issue of JETAI was designed to minimize this kind of discord, by charging the authors to examine the possibility of epistemological pluralism in cognitive science — a ﬁeld whose very diversity makes fundamental disagreement more likely than in other sciences. No doubt, the road mapped out by the editor had been conceived with good intentions in mind, but where did it lead us? It has been said that no good intention must go unpunished. To celebrate this venerable academic tradition (and also because I have a reputation to maintain), the following remarks will therefore be mostly other than conciliatory; caveat lector
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Forrest Wood Jr (1997). Against Cartmill on Hunting. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 4 (1/2):56-60.
Garrett Pendergraft (2011). Nelson Pike's Contribution to the Philosophy of Religion. Philosophia 39 (3):409-431.
P. P. J. (1898). Sonnenschein's Bibliography of Philology and Ancient Literature A Bibliography of Philology and Ancient Literature. W. Swan Sonnenschein. Pp. 373 (793—1009 and 619—775) Being the Sections Relating to These Subjects in The Best Books and The Reader's Guide. Swan Sonnenschein & Co. 1897. 10s. 6d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 12 (08):423-.
David Basinger (1984). Griffin and Pike on Divine Power. Philosophy Research Archives 10:347-352.
John Fischer (2011). Foreknowledge, Freedom, and the Fixity of the Past. Philosophia 39 (3):461-474.
Daniel Zelinski (2011). On Pike on “Union Without Distinction” in Christian Mysticism. Philosophia 39 (3):493-509.
Kevin Corcoran (1996). Is Theistic Experience Phenomenologically Possible? Religious Studies 32 (4):449 - 461.
Wesley Morriston (1982). Pike and Hoffman on Divine Foreknowledge and Human Freedom. Philosophy Research Archives 8:521-529.
Added to index2009-06-09
Total downloads4 ( #258,452 of 1,102,699 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #296,833 of 1,102,699 )
How can I increase my downloads?