David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Minds and Machines 5 (1):45-68 (1995)
It is proposed to conceive of representation as an emergent phenomenon that is supervenient on patterns of activity of coarsely tuned and highly redundant feature detectors. The computational underpinnings of the outlined concept of representation are (1) the properties of collections of overlapping graded receptive fields, as in the biological perceptual systems that exhibit hyperacuity-level performance, and (2) the sufficiency of a set of proximal distances between stimulus representations for the recovery of the corresponding distal contrasts between stimuli, as in multidimensional scaling. The present preliminary study appears to indicate that this concept of representation is computationally viable, and is compatible with psychological and neurobiological data
|Keywords||Computation Physics Representation Science Vision|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Christopher Gauker (2012). Perception Without Propositions. Philosophical Perspectives 26 (1):19-50.
Ehud Ahissar (1995). Are Single-Cell Data Sufficient for Testing Neural Network Models? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):626.
Joaquin M. Fuster (1995). Not the Module Does Memory Make – but the Network. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):631.
Joyca P. W. Lacroix, Jaap M. J. Murre, Eric O. Postma & H. Jaap Herik (2006). Modeling Recognition Memory Using the Similarity Structure of Natural Input. Cognitive Science 30 (1):121-145.
Elie Bienenstock & Stuart Geman (1995). Where the Adventure Is. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):627.
Similar books and articles
M. J. Tovée (1998). A Neural Basis for the Chorus Model? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):481-481.
James R. Williamson (1998). How is Representation Learned? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):484-484.
Brendan Kitts (1999). Representation Operators and Computation. Minds and Machines 9 (2):223-240.
William S. Robinson (1999). Representation and Cognitive Explanation. In Understanding Representation in the Cognitive Sciences: Does Representation Need Reality, Riegler. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Pub.
Todd M. Bailey (2005). Rules Work on One Representation; Similarity Compares Two Representations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):16-16.
Andrew R. Bailey (1994). Representations Versus Regularities: Does Computation Require Representation? Eidos 12 (1):47-58.
Shimon Edelman (1998). Shape Representation by Second-Order Isomorphism and the Chorus Model: SIC. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):484-493.
Cyril Latimer (1998). The Chorus Scheme: Representation or Isomorphism, Holistic or Analytic? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):476-477.
Mauricio Suarez (2003). Scientific Representation: Against Similarity and Isomorphism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (3):225-244.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #84,582 of 1,101,078 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #115,886 of 1,101,078 )
How can I increase my downloads?