David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Visual objects can be represented by their similarities to a small number of reference shapes or prototypes. This method yields low-dimensional (and therefore computationally tractable) representations, which support both the recognition of familiar shapes and the categorization of novel ones. In this note, we show how such representations can be used in a variety of tasks involving novel objects: viewpoint-invariant recognition, recovery of a canonical view, estimation of pose, and prediction of an arbitrary view. The unifying principle in all these cases is the representation of the view space of the novel object as an interpolation of the view spaces of the reference shapes.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Shimon Edelman (1998). Representation is Representation of Similarities. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):449-467.
Guenther Palm (1998). How to Combine Interpolation with Feedback? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):478-478.
Gregory Ashby & Michael B. Casale (2005). Empirical Dissociations Between Rule-Based and Similarity-Based Categorization. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):15-16.
Martin Jüttner (1998). Representation of Similarities – a Psychometric but Not an Explanatory Concept for Categorization. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):475-476.
Yuri Balashov (1999). Relativistic Objects. Noûs 33 (4):644-662.
Shimon Edelman (1997). Computational Theories of Object Recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1 (8):296-304.
Shimon Edelman & Sharon Duvdevani-Bar (1997). Proc. Edinburgh Workshop on Similarity and Categorization.
Roger N. Shepard (2001). Perceptual-Cognitive Universals as Reflections of the World. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):581-601.
Manish Singh & Barbara Landau (1998). Parts of Visual Shape as Primitives for Categorization. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):36-37.
Emmanuel M. Pothos (2005). The Rules Versus Similarity Distinction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):1-14.
Rachel Keen & Elizabeth S. Spelke, Young Children's Representations of Spatial and Functional Relations Between Objects.
Daniel Burnston & Jonathan Cohen (2012). Perception of Features and Perception of Objects. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 12 (3):283-314.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads16 ( #163,911 of 1,725,305 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #56,064 of 1,725,305 )
How can I increase my downloads?