Phenomenological Ontology or the Explanation of Social Norms?: A Confrontation with William Blattner's Heidegger's Temporal Idealism
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 84 (3):334-344 (2002)
Some of the most important contributions over the past two decades to understanding Heidegger's thought have been made by philosophers writing in English and sharing the broad perspective of analytic – or, perhaps better, “post-analytic” – philosophy. With Heidegger's Temporal Idealism, William Blattner has moved this approach several important steps forward. Like others in this recent movement, he interprets Heidegger not so much in the terms of existentialism or post-structuralism, as in those of the later Wittgenstein, classical American pragmatism, and neo-pragmatism. Also like other Anglo-American interpretations of Heidegger, Blattner's (1.) focuses primarily on the Sein und Zeit era; (2.) tends to steer away from Heidegger's analysis of authenticity and toward his analysis of Dasein's everydayness; (3.) accords an especially large role to Being-with (Mitsein) and the They (das Man) in the constitution of everyday meaning; and (4.) is particularly concerned with developing a view of the foundation of “mind” and scientific knowledge in the practical abilities of Dasein as Being-in-the-world. Given the obvious centrality of time in SZ, it is surprising that there have been relatively few concerted attempts to critically explicate Heidegger's view of it. Blattner's book fills this gap by focusing on Heidegger's interpretation of Dasein's “originary temporality”, as explicated in Division Two of SZ.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mark Basil Tanzer (1998). Heidegger on Realism and Idealism. Journal of Philosophical Research 23:95-111.
Edgar C. Boedeker (2002). Phenomenological Ontology or the Explanation of Social Norms?: A Confrontation with William Blattner's Heidegger's Temporal Idealism. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 84 (3):334-344.
David R. Cerbone (1995). World, World-Entry, and Realism in Early Heidegger. Inquiry 38 (4):401 – 421.
William Blattner (1994). Is Heidegger a Kantian Idealist? Inquiry 37 (2):185 – 201.
William Blattner (2004). Heidegger's Kantian Idealism Revisited. Inquiry 47 (4):321 – 337.
Havi Carel (2007). Temporal Finitude and Finitude of Possibility: The Double Meaning of Death in Being and Time. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (4):541 – 556.
Tony Fisher (2010). Heidegger's Generative Thesis. European Journal of Philosophy 18 (3):363-384.
Piotr Hoffman (2000). Heidegger and the Problem of Idealism. Inquiry 43 (4):403 – 411.
Laurence Paul Hemming (1998). Speaking Out of Turn: Martin Heidegger and Die Kehre. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 6 (3):393 – 423.
William Blattner (1999). Heidegger's Temporal Idealism. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads43 ( #56,216 of 1,696,590 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #186,867 of 1,696,590 )
How can I increase my downloads?