David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4):329-340 (1995)
This paper examines two different, but closely related, classes of problems. The first part deals with whistleblowers, and the difficulties and dangers that they have often faced, although their actions, in the rare cases where they become necessary, are indispensable for the maintenance of honest science. The problems are illustrated by discussion of several specific cases from 1960 to 1990. The second part deals with problems that face many young scientists today, and the stresses to which they are exposed in an increasingly competitive atmosphere. There are powerful pressures for premature publication, and many gifted scientists are driven to spend an inordinate amount of time in writing grant applications that are turned down for lack of funds, while receiving high praise from reviewers. Correction of conditions is an important matter for science policy; it is also important, among other things, to relieve pressures that would tend to encourage deviations from the standards necessary for trustworthy science.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Dr C. Whitbeck (1995). Truth and Trustworthiness in Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4):403-416.
Similar books and articles
Patrick Suppes (1972). Some Open Problems in the Philosophy of Space and Time. Synthese 24 (1-2):298 - 316.
Michael Strevens (2006). The Role of the Matthew Effect in Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37 (2):159-170.
Mathieu Albert, Suzanne Laberge & Brian Hodges (2009). Boundary-Work in the Health Research Field: Biomedical and Clinician Scientists' Perceptions of Social Science Research. [REVIEW] Minerva 47 (2):171-194.
David B. Resnick (1999). Privatized Biomedical Research, Public Fears, and the Hazards of Government Regulation: Lessons From Stem Cell Research. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 7 (3):273-287.
TerryMorehead Dworkin & Melissa S. Baucus (1998). Internal Vs. External Whistleblowers: A Comparison of Whistleblowering Processes. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (12):1281-1298.
Ragnar Fjelland (2002). Facing the Problem of Uncertainty. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15 (2):155-169.
David Weatherall (2003). Problems for Biomedical Research at the Academia-Industrial Interface. Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (1):43-48.
James S. Lubalin & Jennifer L. Matheson (1999). The Fallout: What Happens to Whistleblowers and Those Accused but Exonerated of Scientific Misconduct? Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):229-250.
K. Brad Wray (2003). Is Science Really a Young Man's Game? Social Studies of Science 33:137-49.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #237,322 of 1,096,453 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #231,754 of 1,096,453 )
How can I increase my downloads?