Atomic discourse inthe feynman lectures on physics
Synthese 65 (3):445 - 480 (1985)
| Abstract | We examine the compromises that are actually made in modern scientific discourse concerning atoms. We conclude that even the ideals of clarity and consistency can be legitimately compromised in order to obtain other advantages. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMaurice R. Kibler (2007). From the Mendeleev Periodic Table to Particle Physics and Back to the Periodic Table. Foundations of Chemistry 9 (3).
Christopher P. Toumey (2008). Reading Feynman Into Nanotechnology. Techné 12 (3):133-168.
Niels Bohr (1958/2010). Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge. New York, Wiley.
Letitia Meynell (2008). Why Feynman Diagrams Represent. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22 (1):39 – 59.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads2 ( #232,684 of 549,753 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,753 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
