Graduate studies at Western
Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (3):315-332 (2011)
|Abstract||This paper addresses three doctrinal phenomena of which it finds evidence in English law: the quiet extension of the criminal law so as to criminalise that which is by no means an obvious offence; the creation of offences the goal of which is not to guide potential offenders away from crime; and the existence of offending behaviour which is not itself thought to justify arrest or prosecution. While such phenomena have already been criticised by other criminal law theorists, this paper offers a critique to which little attention has yet been paid. It argues that the existence of these phenomena has been concealed from public view: that the organs of state have encouraged the belief that they are no part of English law. The paper then argues that it is high time the state came clean. The state owes its people answers for the imposition of the criminal law: it must account for the creation and enforcement of any given criminal offence. When the state misleads its people about the criminal lawâ€™s scope, goals and enforcement, it refuses to provide those people with the answers they are owed|
|Keywords||Criminalisation Transparency Answerability Criminal process Antony Duff|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Douglas Husak (2008). Why Criminal Law: A Question of Content? [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (2):99-122.
Andrew Ashworth & Lucia Zedner (2008). Defending the Criminal Law: Reflections on the Changing Character of Crime, Procedure, and Sanctions. Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (1):21-51.
R. A. Duff (2010). Towards a Theory of Criminal Law? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 84 (1):1-28.
Gerald Dworkin (1985). The Serpent Beguiled Me and I Did Eat: Entrapment and the Creation of Crime. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 4 (1):17 - 39.
Malcolm Thorburn (2011). The Constitution of Criminal Law: Justifications, Policing and the Stateâ€™s Fiduciary Duties. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (3):259-276.
Herwig C. H. Hofmann, Enforcement of Eu Law and National Criminal Law - Legal Problems in Composite Procedures.
François Tanguay-Renaud & James Stribopoulos (eds.) (2012). Rethinking Criminal Law Theory: New Canadian Perspectives in the Philosophy of Domestic, Transnational, and International Criminal Law. Hart Publishing.
John Gardner (2007). Offences and Defences: Selected Essays in the Philosophy of Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
Antony Duff & Stuart P. Green (eds.) (2011). Philosophical Foundations of Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
Larry May & Zachary Hoskins (eds.) (2010). International Criminal Law and Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Nicole A. Vincent (2010). On the Relevance of Neuroscience to Criminal Responsibility. Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (1):77-98.
Larry Alexander (2009). Crime and Culpability: A Theory of Criminal Law. Cambridge University Press.
Roger A. Shiner (2009). Theorizing Criminal Law Reform. Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (2):167-186.
R. A. Duff (2010). Blame, Moral Standing and the Legitimacy of the Criminal Trial. Ratio 23 (2):123-140.
Malcolm Thorburn (2012). Two Conceptions of Equality Before the (Criminal) Law. In François Tanguay-Renaud & James Stribopoulos (eds.), Rethinking Criminal Law Theory: New Canadian Perspectives in the Philosophy of Domestic, Transnational, and International Criminal Law. Hart Publishing.
Added to index2010-12-23
Total downloads17 ( #78,173 of 739,429 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,429 )
How can I increase my downloads?