Gestures of despair and hope: A view on deliberate self-harm from economics and evolutionary biology
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Biological Theory 3 (2):123-138 (2008)
A long-standing theoretical tradition in clinical psychology and psychiatry sees deliberate self-harm , such as wrist-cutting, as “functional”—a means to avoid painful emotions, for example, or to elicit attention from others. There is substantial evidence that DSH serves these functions. Yet the specific links between self-harm and such functions remain obscure. Why don’t self-harmers use less destructive behaviors to blunt painful emotions or elicit attention? Economists and biologists have used game theory to show that, under certain circumstances, self-harmful behaviors by economic agents and animals serve important strategic goals. In particular, “costly signals” can credibly reveal a “private state” in situations where verbal claims and other “cheap” signals might be disbelieved. Here, DSH is scrutinized using signaling theory, and a variant, the theory of bargaining with private information. The social contexts and associated features of DSH suggest that it might be a costly, and therefore credible, signal of need that compels social partners to respond
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Paul W. Andrews (2006). Parent-Offspring Conflict and Cost-Benefit Analysis in Adolescent Suicidal Behavior. Human Nature 17 (2):190-211.
H. Clark Barrett & E. Hagen, Perinatal Sadness Among Shuar Women: Support for an Evolutionary Theory of Psychic Pain.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Anthony J. Steinbock (2007). The Phenomenology of Despair. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (3):435 – 451.
Pablo Sebastían García (2003). Knowledge in Economics: An Evolutionary Viewpoint. Theoria 18 (3):289-296.
Matthias Klaes (2004). Evolutionary Economics: In Defence of 'Vagueness'. Journal of Economic Methodology 11 (3):359-376.
John Beatty (1980). What's Wrong with the Received View of Evolutionary Theory? PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:397 - 426.
Yew-Kwang Ng (1995). Towards Welfare Biology: Evolutionary Economics of Animal Consciousness and Suffering. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 10 (3):255-285.
James Maclaurin & Tim Cochrane (2012). Progress in Evolutionary Economics. Journal of Bioeconomics 14 (2):101-14.
Ariel Meirav (2009). The Nature of Hope. Ratio 22 (2):216-233.
Collin Rice & Joshua Smart (2011). Interdisciplinary Modeling: A Case Study of Evolutionary Economics. Biology and Philosophy 26 (5):655-675.
David N. Stamos (1996). Popper, Falsifiability, and Evolutionary Biology. Biology and Philosophy 11 (2):161-191.
Kim Sterelny (2000). Development, Evolution, and Adaptation. Philosophy of Science 67 (3):387.
H. Looren De Jong & W. J. Van Der Steen (1998). Biological Thinking in Evolutionary Psychology: Rockbottom or Quicksand? Philosophical Psychology 11 (2):183 – 205.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads23 ( #164,484 of 1,902,204 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #114,946 of 1,902,204 )
How can I increase my downloads?