Hypatia 14 (4):50 - 69 (1999)
|Abstract||This essay, using works by Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Hazel Barnes, and Elizabeth Fallaize, documents the correspondence between the philosophical content of Beauvoir's She Came to Stay and Sartre's Being and Nothingness (both originally published in 1943). After reviewing the existential/phenomenological philosophical method, this paper examines the two philosophers' letters and diaries to show that Beauvoir wrote her book before Sartre wrote his and that the distinctive ideas and arguments the two works share originated with Beauvoir|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alain Flajoliet (2010). Sartre's Phenomenological Anthropology Between Psychoanalysis and 'Daseinsanalysis'. Sartre Studies International 16 (1):40-59.
Christopher E. Macann (1993). Four Phenomenological Philosophers: Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, Merleau-Ponty. Routledge.
Felicity Joseph & Jack Reynolds (2011). Existentialism, Phenomenology and Philosophical Method. In Felicity Joseph, Jack Reynolds & Ashley Woodward (eds.), Continuum Companion to Existentialism. Continuum.
John M. Moreland (1973). For-Itself and in-Itself in Sartre and Merleau-Ponty. Philosophy Today 17:311-318.
Reidar Due (2005). Freedom, Nothingness, Consciousness Some Remarks on the Structure of Being and Nothingness. Sartre Studies International 11 (s 1-2):31-42.
Ashley King Scheu (forthcoming). The Viability of the Philosophical Novel: The Case of Simone de Beauvoir's She Came to Stay. Hypatia.
Sarah Richmond (2007). Sartre and Bergson: A Disagreement About Nothingness. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (1):77 – 95.
Karen Green & Nicholas Roffey (2010). Women, Hegel, and Recognition in The Second Sex. Hypatia 25 (2):376-393.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads7 ( #133,637 of 549,699 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,450 of 549,699 )
How can I increase my downloads?