Ratifiability, game theory, and the principle of independence of irrelevant alternatives
Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69 (1):1 – 19 (1991)
| Abstract | This Article does not have an abstract | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesKenneth B. Peter (2002). Jefferson and the Independence of Generations. Environmental Ethics 24 (4):371-387.
Antonio Quesada (2002). Power of Enforcement and Dictatorship. Theory and Decision 52 (4):381-387.
Brian Skyrms (1994). Darwin Meets the Logic of Decision: Correlation in Evolutionary Game Theory. Philosophy of Science 61 (4):503-528.
William Harper (1986). Mixed Strategies and Ratifiability in Causal Decision Theory. Erkenntnis 24 (1):25 - 36.
Daniel M. Hausman (2005). 'Testing' Game Theory. Journal of Economic Methodology 12 (2):211-223.
Martin Peterson (2011). A New Twist to the St. Petersburg Paradox. Journal of Philosophy 108 (12):697-699.
William Harper (1984). Ratifiability and Causal Decision Theory: Comments on Eells and Seidenfeld. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:213 - 228.
Philippe Mongin (2008). Factoring Out the Impossibility of Logical Aggregation. Journal of Economic Theory 141:p. 100-113.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads12 ( #94,595 of 556,888 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,888 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
