Philosophical Studies 149 (2):251 - 267 (2010)
|Abstract||If you are a realist about groups (e.g. religious institutions, football teams, the Mafia etc.) there are three main theories of what to identify groups with. I offer reasons for thinking that two of those theories (groups as sui generis entities and groups as mereological fusions) fail to meet important desiderata. The third option is to identify groups with sets, which meets all of the desiderata if only we take care over which sets they are identified with. I then canvass some possible objections to that third theory, and explain how to avoid them|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Paul C. Eklof (1972). Some Model Theory of Abelian Groups. Journal of Symbolic Logic 37 (2):335-342.
Paul Sheehy (2006). Sharing Space: The Synchronic Identity of Social Groups. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (2):131-148.
Gregory L. Cherlin & Peter H. Schmitt (1981). Undecidable Lt Theories of Topological Abelian Groups. Journal of Symbolic Logic 46 (4):761 - 772.
İlker Yıldırım & Pınar Yolum (2009). Hybrid Models for Achieving and Maintaining Cooperative Symbiotic Groups. Mind and Society 8 (2):243-258.
Francis Oger (1984). The Model Theory of Finitely Generated Finite-by-Abelian Groups. Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (4):1115-1124.
R. W. Brimlow (1996). On Groups, Group Action and Preferential Treatment. Journal of Philosophical Research 21:341-376.
John Lawrence (1986). Tarski's Problem for Varieties of Groups with a Commutator Identity. Journal of Symbolic Logic 51 (1):75-78.
Vladimir G. Pestov (2008). Hyperlinear and Sofic Groups: A Brief Guide. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 14 (4):449-480.
Victor Pambuccian (2005). Groups and Plane Geometry. Studia Logica 81 (3):387 - 398.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #65,360 of 722,863 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,028 of 722,863 )
How can I increase my downloads?