Philosophy of Science 62 (2):179-96 (1995)
|Abstract||It has recently been argued that the success of the connectionist program in cognitive science would threaten folk psychology. I articulate and defend a "minimalist" construal of folk psychology that comports well with empirical evidence on the folk understanding of belief and is compatible with even the most radical developments in cognitive science|
|Keywords||Cognitive Science Folk Psychology Research Science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Eric Saidel (1992). What Price Neurophilosophy? Philosophy of Science Association 1:461-68.
Stephen P. Stich & Shaun Nichols (2002). Folk Psychology. In Stephen P. Stich & Ted A. Warfield (eds.), Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Mind. Blackwell.
A. Goldman (1993). The Psychology of Folk Psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16:15-28.
Ian Ravenscroft, Folk Psychology as a Theory. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Peter Godfrey-Smith (2005). Folk Psychology as a Model. Philosophers' Imprint 5 (6):1-16.
Shaun Nichols & Stephen P. Stich (1994). Folk Psychology. Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science.
William E. Morris & Robert C. Richardson (1995). How Not to Demarcate Cognitive Science and Folk Psychology: A Response to Pickering and Chater. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 5 (3):339-355.
Martin J. Pickering & Nick Chater (1995). Why Cognitive Science is Not Formalized Folk Psychology. Minds and Machines 5 (3):309-337.
Andy Clark (1987). From Folk Psychology to Naive Psychology. Cognitive Science 11 (2):139-54.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads46 ( #28,106 of 722,774 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #17,045 of 722,774 )
How can I increase my downloads?