Achievements of the hermeneutic-phenomenological approach to natural science A comparison with constructivist sociology
Man and World 30 (3):343-367 (1997)
|Abstract||The hermeneutic-phenomenological approach to the natural sciences has a special interest in the interpretive phases of these sciences and in the circumstances, cognitive and social, that lead to divergent as well as convergent interpretations. It tries to ascertain the role of the hermeneutic circle in research; and to this end it has developed, over the past three decades or so, a number of adaptations of hermeneutic and phenomenological concepts to processes of experimentation and theory-making. The purpose of the present essay is to show how appropriate these concepts are to an important current research program (solar neutrinos) and thus to point out what difference they make to our understanding of science as a whole. This goal is pursued by means of comparison. The program of social constructivism in natural science has produced alternative but parallel concepts, embodied in an alternative and parallel vocabulary. The contrast between this vocabulary and that of hermeneutics and phenomenology reveals, so I argue, the advantages of the latter. But actually it does more: It reveals as well the pre-understanding or prejudgment of science embedded in each approach|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Dimitri Ginev (1999). On the Hermeneutic Fore-Structure of Scientific Research. Continental Philosophy Review 32 (2):143-168.
Donald McIntosh (1997). Husserl, Weber, Freud, and the Method of the Human Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27 (3):328-353.
Don Ihde (1997). Thingly Hermeneutics/Technoconstructions. Man and World 30 (3):369-381.
Dimitri Ginev (2013). Ethnomethodological and Hermeneutic-Phenomenological Perspectives on Scientific Practices. Human Studies 36 (2):277-305.
Ricardo Waizbort (2004). Objectivity in Social Science: Toward a Hermeneutical Evolutionary Theory. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (1):151-162.
James Franklin (1984). Natural Sciences as Textual Interpretation: The Hermeneutics of the Natural Sign. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 44 (4):509-520.
Don S. Browning (2011). Reviving Christian Humanism: Science and Religion. Zygon 46 (3):673-685.
Georgia Warnke (1985). Hermeneneutics and the Social Sciences: A Gadamerian Critique of Rorty. Inquiry 28 (1-4):339 – 357.
Joseph J. Kockelmans (1997). On the Hermeneutical Nature of Modern Natural Science. Man and World 30 (3):299-313.
Theodore Kisiel (1997). A Hermeneutics of the Natural Sciences? The Debate Updated. Man and World 30 (3):329-341.
H. L. Dreyfus (2011). Medicine as Combining Natural and Human Science. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (4):335-341.
A. P. (1998). The Scope of Hermeneutics in Natural Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 29 (2):273-298.
N. Jardine (2003). Hermeneutic Strategies in Gerd Buchdahl's Kantian Philosophy of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (1):183-208.
Philip Benesch (2005). Singularism and Multiplism in the Work of Karl Popper. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (1):23-32.
Dimitri Ginev (2009). From Existential Conception of Science to Hermeneutic Phenomenology of Scientific Research. Journal of Philosophical Research 34:365-389.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads14 ( #90,445 of 722,765 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,765 )
How can I increase my downloads?