Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 36:89-112 (2011)
|Abstract||I examine the impact of the presence of anarchists among key legal officials upon the legal positivist theories of H.L.A. Hart and Joseph Raz. For purposes of this paper, an anarchist is one who believes that the law cannot successfully obligate or create reasons for action beyond prudential reasons, such as avoiding sanction. I show that both versions of positivism require key legal officials to endorse the law in some way, and that if a legal system can continue to exist and function when its key officials reject the reason-giving character of law, then we have a reason to re-examine and amend legal positivism.|
|Keywords||anarchism internal point of view H.L.A. Hart Joseph Raz Legal Positivism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
F. Atria (1999). Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory Revisited. Law and Philosophy 18 (5):537-577.
Kristen Rundle (2013). Form and Agency in Raz's Legal Positivism. Law and Philosophy 32 (6):1-25.
Thom Brooks (2007). Between Natural Law and Legal Positivism: Dworkin and Hegel on Legal Theory. Georgia State University Law Review 23 (3):513-60.
Joseph Raz (1979). The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford University Press.
Francois Chevrette & Hugo Cyr, Legal Positivism? What Are You Talking About? ('De Quel Positivisme Parlez-Vous?').
Mario Jori (ed.) (1992). Legal Positivism. New York University Press.
Matthew H. Kramer (2009). Moral Principles and Legal Validity. Ratio Juris 22 (1):44-61.
Robert P. George (ed.) (1996). The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism. Oxford University Press.
S. Coyle (2002). Hart, Raz and the Concept of a Legal System. Law and Philosophy 21 (3):275-304.
Wilfrid J. Waluchow (1994). Inclusive Legal Positivism. Oxford University Press.
G. Pino (1999). The Place of Legal Positivism in Contemporary Constitutional States. Law and Philosophy 18 (5):513-536.
Vittorio Villa (2009). Inclusive Legal Positivism, Legal Interpretation, and Value-Judgments. Ratio Juris 22 (1):110-127.
Anthony James Sebok (1998). Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence. Cambridge University Press.
Aldo Schiavello (2011). Neil MacCormick's Second Thoughts on Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory. A Defence of the Original View. Ratio Juris 24 (2):140-155.
Added to index2011-06-20
Total downloads145 ( #3,622 of 722,745 )
Recent downloads (6 months)65 ( #682 of 722,745 )
How can I increase my downloads?