David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Critical Review 10 (1):135-153 (1996)
Abstract Popper's philosophy of science represents a radical departure from almost all other views about knowledge. This helps account for serious misunderstandings of it among admirers no less than among adversaries. The view that knowledge has and needs no foundations is counterintuitive and apparently relativistic. But Popper's fallibilism is in fact a far cry from anti?realism. Similarly, Popper's social and political philosophy, although seemingly conservative in practice, can be quite radical in theory. And while Popper was an ardent democrat, his reasons for supporting democracy were so unusual that they may escape the problem posed for democratic theory by the political ignorance of the demos.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Adorno, W. Theodor, H. Albert, R. Dahrendorf, J. Habermas, H. Pilot & K. Popper (1976). The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology. Heinemann Educational Books.
Bryan Magee & Anthony Quinton (eds.) (1971/1986). Modern British Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Karl R. Popper (1989/2002). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. Routledge.
Karl R. Popper (1972). Objective Knowledge. Oxford,Clarendon Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Jeffrey Friedman (1998). Public Ignorance and Democratic Theory. Critical Review 12 (4):397-411.
Similar books and articles
Calvin Hayes (2001). Fallibilism Democracy and the Market: The Meta-Theoretical Foundations of Popper's Political Philosophy. University Press of America.
Struan Jacobs (1999). Thoughts on Political Sources of Karl Popper's Philosophy of Science. Journal of Philosophical Research 24:445-457.
Tom Settle (1996). Six Things Popper Would Like Biologists Not to Ignore: In Memoriam, Karl Raimund Popper, 1902–1994. Biology and Philosophy 11 (2):141-159.
reviewed John Wettersten (2006). I. C. Jarvie: The Republic of Science: The Emergence of Popper's Social View of Science 1935–1945,. Philosophy of Science 73 (1):108-121.
Peter Lipton (1995). Popper and Reliabilism. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 39:31-43.
Bruce Caldwell (2005). Recovering Popper: For the Left? Critical Review 17 (1-2):49-68.
David L. Hull (1999). The Use and Abuse of Sir Karl Popper. Biology and Philosophy 14 (4):481-504.
Boudewijn de Bruin (2006). Popper's Conception of the Rationality Principle in the Social Sciences. In Ian Jarvie, David Miller & Karl Milford (eds.), Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment: Selected Papers from Karl Popper 2002: Volume III: Science. Ashgate.
Jeff Kochan (2009). Popper's Communitarianism. In Zuzana Parusniková & Robert S. Cohen (eds.), Rethinking Popper (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 272). Springer. 287--303.
Fred Eidlin (1999). Matching Popperian Theory to Practice. In I. C. Jarvie & Sandra Pralong (eds.), Popper's Open Society After Fifty Years: The Continuing Relevance of Karl Popper. Routledge.
Struan Jacobs & Ian Tregenza (2013). Rationalism and Tradition: The Popper–Oakeshott Conversation. European Journal of Political Theory 13 (1):1474885112471274.
Philip Parvin (2010). Karl Popper. Continuum.
Added to index2011-10-18
Total downloads2 ( #494,216 of 1,696,221 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?