Graduate studies at Western
Hypatia 23 (2):pp. 48-60 (2008)
|Abstract||If women are not yet accorded the full rights of citizenship internationally and especially in the military context, a feminist position on just war may have to be provisional. Drawing on Virginia Woolf's argument referenced in the title, Eide suggests in this essay that feminist theory develop its principles from women's exclusion from national privileges and argues that jus post bellum or justice after war be central to feminist theories of just war.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Liz Philipose (1996). The Laws of War and Women's Human Rights. Hypatia 11 (4):46 - 62.
Sally J. Scholz (2005). Human Rights, Radical Feminism, and Rape in War. Social Philosophy Today 21:207-224.
Jeff McMahan (2004). The Ethics of Killing in War. Ethics 114 (4):693-733.
Steven Metz & Phillip R. Cuccia (eds.) (2011). Defining War for the 21st Century. Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College.
Brian Orend (2004). Kant's Ethics of War and Peace. Journal of Military Ethics 3 (2):161-177.
Debra B. Bergoffen (2008). The Just War Tradition: Translating the Ethics of Human Dignity Into Political Practices. Hypatia 23 (2):pp. 72-94.
Joseph Betz (2005). Proportionality, Just War Theory, and America's 2003–2004 War Against Iraq. Social Philosophy Today 21:137-156.
Larry May (2012). After War Ends: A Philosophical Perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Chris J. Cuomo (1996). War Is Not Just an Event: Reflections on the Significance of Everyday Violence. Hypatia 11 (4):30 - 45.
Lucinda J. Peach (1994). An Alternative to Pacifism? Feminism and Just-War Theory. Hypatia 9 (2):152 - 172.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #107,425 of 739,315 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,315 )
How can I increase my downloads?