Some remarks on “language-created entities”

Acta Analytica 24 (3):185-192 (2009)
Abstract
Some entities, such as fictional characters, propositions, properties, events and numbers are prima facie promising candidates for owing their existence to our linguistic and conceptual practices. However, it is notoriously hard to pin down just what sets such allegedly “language-created” entities apart from ordinary entities. The present paper considers some of the features that are supposed to distinguish between entities of the two kinds and argues that, on an independently plausible account of what it takes to individuate objects, the criteria let in more than friends of the strategy might be happy with.
Keywords Constructivism  Individuation  Minimal entities  Fictional characters  Abstract objects  Steven Schiffer
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,371
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Iris Einheuser (2006). Counterconventional Conditionals. Philosophical Studies 127 (3):459 - 482.
Richard E. Grandy, Sortals. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 12 references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-06-13

Total downloads

59 ( #26,656 of 1,102,868 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #84,702 of 1,102,868 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.