David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sociological Theory 16 (3):211-238 (1998)
In most of the vast scholarly literature on constitutional-democratic regimes, the major emphasis has been on the broader social, economic, or cultural conditions conductive to their development, breakdown, or consolidation and continuity (Diamond 1993b; Diamond, Linz, and Lipset 1989, 1990). The major thesis of this essay is that fragility and instability are inherent in the very constitution of modern constitutional-democratic regimes, and are rooted in (1) the tensions between the different conceptions of democracy (especially between constitutional and participatory democracy) and (2) the central aspects of the political and cultural program of modernity. The common core of these premises is the openness of the political process (particularly with regard to protest) and the concomitant tendency toward continual redefinition of the political realm. Openness is an important contributor to the fragility of modern democratic regimes; paradoxically, it also allows for their continuity. The key question, then, is how and under what conditions non-zero-sum conceptions of the "game" of politics develop. The second part of this essay takes up this question, with special emphasis on the development and reproduction of trust among different sectors of society, the relationships between such sectors and the centers of society, and the construction of different types of collective identity
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
William Nelson (2008). The Epistemic Value of the Democratic Process. Episteme 5 (1):pp. 19-32.
Jean-Luc Nancy (2006). On the Meanings of Democracy. Theoria 53 (111):1-5.
Liviu Damsa (2011). Lustration (Administrative Justice) and Closure in Post–Communist East Central Europe. International Journal of Public Law and Policy 4 (1):335-375.
Patrick M. Jenlink (2007). Globalization and the Evolution of Democratic Civil Society: Democracy as Spatial Discourse. World Futures 63 (5 & 6):386 – 407.
Andreas Kalyvas (2006). The Basic Norm and Democracy in Hans Kelsen’s Legal and Political Theory. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (5):573-599.
John Dunn (1981). Book Review:The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes. Juan J. Linz, Alfred Stepan. [REVIEW] Ethics 91 (4):685-.
Andreas Kalyvas (2008). Democracy and the Politics of the Extraordinary: Max Weber, Carl Schmitt, and Hannah Arendt. Cambridge University Press.
Norman Schofield & Micah Levinson (2008). Modeling Authoritarian Regimes. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (3):243-283.
Alan Gilbert (1992). Must Global Politics Constrain Democracy? Realism, Regimes, and Democratic Internationalism. Political Theory 20 (1):8-37.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads29 ( #143,722 of 1,934,588 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,272 of 1,934,588 )
How can I increase my downloads?