Res Publica 12 (4) (2006)
|Abstract||This paper considers a guardianship model for the legal representation of future generations. According to this model, national and international courts should be given the competence to appoint guardians for future generations, if agents who care about the welfare of posterity apply for the creation of a guardianship in relation to a dispute that can be resolved by the application of law. This reform would grant guardians of future people legal standing or locus standi before courts, that is, the right to bring an action before a court of law for adjudication. Although the guardianship model faces several difficult theoretical and practical problems pertaining to the representation of different near and distant future generations, it is argued that this model – and certain other legal norms intended to protect future basic needs – can be justified on the basis of the principle of liberty.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Frederick Schauer (1997). Does Simplicity Bring Liberty? Critical Review 11 (3):393-406.
Guido Boella, Leonardo Lesmo & Rossana Damiano (2004). On the Ontological Status of Plans and Norms. Artificial Intelligence and Law 12 (4):317-357.
Richard I. Sikora & Brian M. Barry (eds.) (1978/1996). Obligations to Future Generations. White Horse Press.
Anja Oskamp (1992). Model for Knowledge and Legal Expert Systems. Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (4).
Kristian Skagen Ekeli (2004). Environmental Risks, Uncertainty and Intergenerational Ethics. Environmental Values 13 (4):421-448.
Kristian Skagen Ekeli (2005). Giving a Voice to Posterity – Deliberative Democracy and Representation of Future People. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (5).
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #65,306 of 556,888 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,888 )
How can I increase my downloads?