David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ratio Juris 24 (4):435-460 (2011)
This article considers Dworkin's influential argument against legislative intent in chapter 9 of Law's Empire. The argument proves much less than is often assumed for it fails to address the possibility that the institution of the legislature may form and act on intentions. Indeed, analysis of Dworkin's argument lends support to that possibility. Dworkin aims to refute legislative intent in order to elucidate his own theory of statutory interpretation. That theory fails to explain plausibly legislative action. Dworkin's argument does not refute legislative intent but instead suggests there is reason to think that the legislature is capable of intentional action
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
H. L. A. Hart (1994). The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press.
R. M. Dworkin (1988). Law's Empire. Harvard University Press.
Michael Bratman (1999). Faces of Intention: Selected Essays on Intention and Agency. Cambridge University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Win-Chiat Lee (1989). Statutory Interpretation and the Counterfactual Test for Legislative Intention. Law and Philosophy 8 (3):383-404.
David Estlund (1995). Legislative Intent and Other Essays on Law, Politics and Morality. Philosophical Review 104 (4):605-607.
James W. Nickel (1996). Book Review:Legislative Intent and Other Essays on Law, Politics, and Morality. Gerald C. MacCallum, Jr., Marcus G. Singer, Rex Martin. [REVIEW] Ethics 106 (2):466-.
Vincent Chiao (2013). Punishment and Permissibility in the Criminal Law. Law and Philosophy 32 (6):729-765.
Dean Goorden (2012). Dworkin and Phenomenology of the “Pre-Legal”? Ratio Juris 25 (3):393-408.
James A. E. Macpherson (2010). Legislative Intentionalism and Proxy Agency. Law and Philosophy 29 (1):1-29.
Scott Hershovitz (ed.) (2006). Exploring Law's Empire: The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin. Oxford University Press.
Jonathan R. H. Law, "Making Available": Does an Offer to Share Digital Music Without Permission Constitute Copyright Infringement?
John Gardner (2006). Law's Aims in Law's Empire. In Scott Hershovitz (ed.), Exploring Law's Empire: The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin. Oxford University Press
E. Francesconi & A. Passerini (2007). Automatic Classification of Provisions in Legislative Texts. Artificial Intelligence and Law 15 (1):1-17.
J. H. Bogart (1987). Legislative Duty and the Independence of Law. Law and Philosophy 6 (2):187 - 203.
Onora O'Neill (2012). The Jurisprudence Annual Lecture 2012 Making Laws Better or Making Better Laws? Jurisprudence 3 (1):1-12.
Andrei Marmor (ed.) (1995). Law and Interpretation: Essays in Legal Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2011-11-04
Total downloads25 ( #150,287 of 1,793,278 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #463,804 of 1,793,278 )
How can I increase my downloads?