Graduate studies at Western
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):470-471 (1998)
|Abstract||Although we find the idea of representation by similarities attractive as such, we have two main objections to the specific proposal of Edelman. First, he does not consider complexity issues in terms of storage and speed of recall for recognition. Related to this, the appearance of objects depends on far more factors than just shape, illumination, and pose. This requires an intermediate shape abstraction process that extracts category-specific shape properties from the mixed appearance of images.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
James Mensch (2007). Public Space. Continental Philosophy Review 40 (1):31-47.
Michael J. Pratt (2005). Some Aspects of Product Shape in Mechanical Engineering. Axiomathes 15 (3):373-397.
David H. Sanford (1983). The Perception of Shape. In Carl Ginet & Sydney Shoemaker (eds.), Knowledge And Mind: Phil Essays. Oxford University Press.
Philip Pettit (2009). Physicalism Without Pop-Out. In David Braddon-Mitchell & Robert Nola (eds.), Conceptual Analysis and Philosophical Naturalism. Mit Press.
John Campbell (1996). Shape Properties, Experience of Shape and Shape Concepts. Philosophical Issues 7:351-363.
D. J. Bennett (2012). Seeing Shape: Shape Appearances and Shape Constancy. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (3):487-518.
Charles Siewert (2006). Is the Appearance of Shape Protean? Psyche 12 (3):1-16.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #292,879 of 740,197 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?