David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ratio 23 (4):374-392 (2010)
It is common to believe that some of our concerns are deeper concerns of ours than are others and that some of our attitudes are central rather than peripheral to our psychological identity. What is the best approach to characterizing depth or centrality to the self? This paper addresses the matter of the depth and authenticity of attitudes and the relation of this matter to the autonomy of action. It defends a conception of the real self in terms of preferences and convictions that cohere in a particular structural sense. It thereby gives content to the notion of wholeheartedness to which various action theorists make appeal. The approach is defended in part by an examination of how it handles the phenomenon of ambivalence.1
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Logi Gunnarsson (2014). In Defense of Ambivalence and Alienation. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (1):13-26.
Thomas Schramme (2014). On Being Wholeheartedly Ambivalent: Indecisive Will, Unity of the Self, and Integration by Narration. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (1):27-40.
Similar books and articles
Maximilian De Gaynesford (ed.) (2011). Agents and Their Actions. Wiley-Blackwell.
J. S. Swindell Blumenthal-Barby (2010). Ambivalence. Philosophical Explorations 13 (1):23 – 34.
David Svolba (2011). Swindell, Frankfurt, and Ambivalence. Philosophical Explorations 14 (2):219 - 225.
B. Roessler (2012). Authenticity of Cultures and of Persons. Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (4-5):445-455.
David P. Levine (2008). Politics Without Reason: The Perfect World and the Liberal Ideal. Palgrave Macmillan.
Wilhelm Vossenkuhl (1981). Free Agency: A Non-Reductionist Causal Account. Grazer Philosophische Studien 14:113-132.
Erik Parens (2005). Authenticity and Ambivalence: Toward Understanding the Enhancement Debate. Hastings Center Report 35 (3):34-41.
Elisabeth Pacherie (2007). The Sense of Control and the Sense of Agency. Psyche 13 (1):1 - 30.
William Hasselberger (2012). Agency, Autonomy, and Social Intelligibility. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (2):255-278.
Helen Fielding (1996). Grounding Agency in Depth: The Implications of Merleau-Ponty's Thought for the Politics of Feminism. [REVIEW] Human Studies 19 (2):175-184.
Angus Brook (2009). The Potentiality of Authenticity in Becoming a Teacher. Educational Philosophy and Theory 41 (1):46-59.
Yves Citton (2009). Political Agency and the Ambivalence of the Sensible. In Gabriel Rockhill & Philip Watts (eds.), Jacques Rancière: History, Politics, Aesthetics. Duke University Press
Added to index2010-10-22
Total downloads58 ( #41,588 of 1,699,805 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #128,702 of 1,699,805 )
How can I increase my downloads?