David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 17 (1-4):327-338 (1974)
In Explanation and Understanding von Wright argues that if, as he suggests, a practical inference schema is adopted as an explanation model for actions, then it follows that historical explanations are non?causal. My criticisms are principally directed against his version of the Logical Connection Argument which attempts to show that the verification of the action description to be explained and the verification of the intention description which explains it are interdependent. Von Wright blurs the important distinctions (1) between acting with an intention and acting intentionally; (2) between intention to perform an action and intention to bring about a consequence of it; and (3) between verification of intention descriptions in general and of a description of a specific intention. The ?conclusion? of his practical inference schema cannot be the appropriate historical explanandum and the explaining procedure that he suggests is shown to be ultimately circular
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
William H. Dray (1979). Laws and Explanation in History. Greenwood Press.
Jane Roland Martin (1970). Explaining, Understanding, and Teaching. New York,Mcgraw-Hill.
Frederick M. Stoutland (1970). The Logical Connection Argument. American Philosophical Quarterly.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Nishi Shah (2008). How Action Governs Intention. Philosophers' Imprint 8 (5):1-19.
L. Wright (1973). Rival Explanations. Mind 82 (October):497-514.
J. L. A. Garcia (1990). The Intentional and the Intended. Erkenntnis 33 (2):191 - 209.
R. W. Newell (1973). Prototractatus, An Early Version of Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus By Ludwig Wittgenstein. Edited by B. F. McGuinness, T. Nyberg and G. H. Von Wright, with a Translation by D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness, an Historical Introduction by G. H. Von Wright and a Facsimile of the Author's Manuscript. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1971, 256 + 124 Pp., £7.50. [REVIEW] Philosophy 48 (183):97-.
G. H. von Wright (1971/2004). Explanation and Understanding. Cornell University Press.
G. H. von Wright (1957). Logical Studies. London, Routledge and K. Paul.
Kieran Setiya (2011). Knowledge of Intention. In Anton Ford, Jennifer Hornsby & Frederick Stoutland (eds.), Essays on Anscombe's Intention. Harvard University Press. 170--197.
Larry Wright (1974). Emergency Behavior. Inquiry 17 (1-4):43 – 47.
Tim Thornton (1997). Intention, Rule Following and the Strategic Role of Wright's Order of Determination Test. Philosophical Investigations 20 (2):136–151.
Richard Holton (1993). Intention Detecting. Philosophical Quarterly 44 (172):298-318.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads11 ( #196,012 of 1,696,808 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,744 of 1,696,808 )
How can I increase my downloads?