Against universal mereological composition
Dialectica 62 (4):433-454 (2008)
| Abstract | This paper opposes universal mereological composition (UMC). Sider defends it: unless UMC were true, he says, it could be indeterminate how many objects there are in the world. I argue that there is no general connection between how widely composition occurs and how many objects there are in the world. Sider fails to support UMC. I further argue that we should disbelieve in UMC objects. Existing objections against them say that they are radically unlike Aristotelian substances. True, but there is a stronger objection. This is that they are characterized by no properties, and so fail to be like anything – even themselves. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDuncan Watson (2010). An Argument Against an Argument Against the Necessity of Universal Mereological Composition. Analysis 70 (1):78-82.
Sean Walsh (2012). Modal Mereology and Modal Supervenience. Philosophical Studies 159 (1):1-20.
L. A. Paul (forthcoming). Mereological Bundle Theory. In Hans Burkhardt, Johanna Seibt & Guido Imaguire (eds.), Handbook of Mereology. Philosophia Verlag.
Tobias Hansson Wahlberg (2009). Is Phosphorus Hesperus? Axiomathes 19 (1).
István Aranyosi (2009). Hesperus is Phosphorus, Indeed. Axiomathes 19 (2):223-224.
Cody Gilmore (2010). Sider, The Inheritance of Intrinsicality, and Theories of Composition. Philosophical Studies 151:177-197.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads50 ( #21,111 of 549,061 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,061 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
