Ethics and Behavior 6 (3):239 – 256 (1996)
|Abstract||Although gender differences in attitudes toward animal research have been reported in the literature for some time, exploration into the nature of these differences has received less attention. This article examines gender differences in responses to a survey of attitudes toward the use of animals in research. The survey was completed by college students and consisted of items intended to tap different issues related to the animal research debate. Results indicated that women were more likely than men to support tenets of the animal protection movement. Likewise, women were more likely than men to favor increased restrictions on animal use and were more concerned than men about the suffering of research animals. Analysis of item contents suggested that women endorsed items reflecting a general caring for animals, were more willing than men to make personal sacrifices such as giving up meat and medical benefits in an effort to protect animals, and were more likely than men to question the use of animals in research on scientific grounds. Men, on the other hand, tended to emphasize the potential benefits arising from the use of animals in research.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Shelley L. Gavin & Harold A. Herzog (1992). The Ethical Judgment of Animal Research. Ethics and Behavior 2 (4):263 – 286.
Beth A. Dixon (1996). The Feminist Connection Between Women and Animals. Environmental Ethics 18 (2):181-194.
Leslie M. Dawson (1997). Ethical Differences Between Men and Women in the Sales Profession. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (11):1143-1152.
Nicholas H. Steneck (1997). Role of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in Monitoring Research. Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):173 – 184.
A. Catherine McCabe, Rhea Ingram & Mary Conway Dato-on (2006). The Business of Ethics and Gender. Journal of Business Ethics 64 (2):101 - 116.
Francine L. Dolins (ed.) (1999). Attitudes to Animals: Views in Animal Welfare. Cambridge University Press.
Jac A. A. Swart (2004). The Wild Animal as a Research Animal. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (2):181-197.
Shelley L. Galvin & Harold A. Herzog Jr (1992). Ethical Ideology, Animal Rights Activism, and Attitudes Toward the Treatment of Animals. Ethics and Behavior 2 (3):141 – 149.
Donald A. Saucier & Mary E. Cain (2006). The Foundations of Attitudes About Animal Research. Ethics and Behavior 16 (2):117 – 133.
Bernard E. Whitley (2001). Gender Differences in Affective Responses to Having Cheated: The Mediating Role of Attitudes. Ethics and Behavior 11 (3):249 – 259.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #93,265 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?