David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Law and Philosophy 29 (5):535-569 (2010)
How is it possible that the idea of sovereignty still features in legal and political philosophy? Most contemporary political philosophers have little use for the idea of ‘unlimited’ or ‘absolute’ power, which is how sovereignty is normally defined. A closer look at sovereignty identifies two possible accounts: sovereignty as the fact of power or sovereignty as a title to govern. The first option, which was pursued by John Austin’s command theory of law, leads to an unfamiliar view of law and the state, which was justly criticised by H. L. A. Hart. The second option, leads to a paradox, because under this view sovereignty is both limited and unlimited. Hence, this argument shows that law and sovereignty are actually incompatible. Where there is law there is no sovereignty, and where there is sovereignty there is no law.
|Keywords||Philosophy Logic Political Science Social Sciences, general Law Theory/Law Philosophy Philosophy of Law|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Oles Andriychuk (2013). The Law - Morality Conundrum: On the Multifaceted Sources of Normativity. Rechtstheorie 44 (1):1-28.
Similar books and articles
D. M. Lewis (1989). Athenian Politics Martin Ostwald: From Popular Sovereignty to the Sovereignty of Law. Law, Society and Politics in Fifth-Century Athens. Pp. Xxii + 663. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press, 1986. $75. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 39 (02):279-281.
Jonathan Havercroft (2011). Captives of Sovereignty. Cambridge University Press.
Jeffrey Paris (2004). Kurios George and the Sovereign State. Radical Philosophy Review 7 (2):115-134.
R. A. Eastwood (1929). The Austinian Theories of Law and Sovereignty. London, Methuen & Co. Ltd..
Ronald A. Brand, Sovereignty: The State, the Individual, and the International Legal System in the Twenty First Century.
Joseph V. Dolan (1989). Book Review:From Popular Sovereignty to the Sovereignty of Law: Law, Society, and Politics in Fifth-Century Athens. Martin Ostwald. [REVIEW] Ethics 99 (2):436-.
Nicholas F. Jones (1989). From Popular Sovereignty to the Sovereignty of Law: Law, Society, and Politics in Fifth-Century Athens. Ancient Philosophy 9 (1):118-121.
Bedri Gencer (2010). Sovereignty and the Separation of Powers in John Locke. The European Legacy 15 (3):323-339.
Added to index2010-05-07
Total downloads58 ( #33,066 of 1,679,365 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #60,351 of 1,679,365 )
How can I increase my downloads?