Discreteness and relevance: A reply to Roman poznanski
Minds and Machines 12 (3):437-438 (2002)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAndrew A. Fingelkurts & Alexander A. Fingelkurts (2006). Timing in Cognition and EEG Brain Dynamics: Discreteness Versus Continuity. Cognitive Processing 7 (3):135-162.
Edward Poznanski, Leon J. Goldstein & Sidney Gendin (1974). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] Philosophia 4 (4).
S. J. Jacek Poznański (2009). Nauka a Wartości. International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (3).
Poznański (2009). Nauka a Wartości. International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (3):399-401.
Fred Dretske (1990). Reply: Causal Relevance and Explanatory Exclusion. In Enrique Villanueva (ed.), Information, Semantics, and Epistemology. Blackwell.
Arthur Sullivan (2004). On Causal Relevance: A Reply to Raymont. Dialogue 43 (2):355-365.
Peter Achinstein (2004). A Challenge to Positive Relevance Theorists: Reply to Roush. Philosophy of Science 71 (4):521-524.
James W. Garson (1991). What Connectionists Cannot Do: The Threat to Classical AI. In Terence E. Horgan & John L. Tienson (eds.), Connectionism and the Philosophy of Mind. Kluwer.
Roman R. Poznanski (2002). Discussion the Importance of Continuity: A Reply to Chris Eliasmith. Minds and Machines 12 (3):435-435.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads3 ( #202,008 of 549,122 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
