David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (1):51-58 (2003)
Conducting empirical research on gender in medical ethics is a challenge from a theoretical as well as a practical point of view. It still has to be clarified how gender aspects can be integrated without sustaining gender stereotypes. The developmental psychologist Carol Gilligan was among the first to question ethics from a gendered point of view. The notion of care introduced by her challenged conventional developmental psychology as well as moral philosophy. Gilligan was criticised, however, because her concept of âtwo different voicesâ may reinforce gender stereotypes. Moreover, although Gilligan stressed relatedness, this is not reflected in her own empirical approach, which still focuses on individual moral reflection. Concepts from social psychology can help overcome both problems. Social categories like gender shape moral identity and moral decisions. If morality is understood as being lived through actions of persons in social relationships, gender becomes a helpful category of moral analysis. Our findings will provide a conceptual basis for the question how empirical research in medical ethics can successfully embrace a gendered perspective
|Keywords||empirical research ethic of care gender Gilligan moral philosophy social psychology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Samuli I. Saarni, Piitu Parmanne & Ritva Halila (2008). Ethically Problematic Treatment Decisions: A Physician Survey. Bioethics 22 (2):121–129.
Silke Schicktanz (2009). Interpreting Advance Directives: Ethical Considerations of the Interplay Between Personal and Cultural Identity. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 17 (2):158-171.
Similar books and articles
Gabriel D. Donleavy (2008). No Man's Land: Exploring the Space Between Gilligan and Kohlberg. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 80 (4):807 - 822.
Hilge Landweer & Gertrudetr Postl (2005). Anthropological, Social, and Moral Limitations of a Multiplicity of Genders. Hypatia 20 (2):27-47.
Katrin Nikoleyczik (2012). Towards Diffractive Transdisciplinarity: Integrating Gender Knowledge Into the Practice of Neuroscientific Research. Neuroethics 5 (3):231-245.
Regina M. O'Neill & Stacy D. Blake-Beard (2002). Gender Barriers to the Female Mentor – Male Protégé Relationship. Journal of Business Ethics 37 (1):51 - 63.
Muriel J. Bebeau & Mary M. Brabeck (1987). Integrating Care and Justice Issues in Professional Moral Education: A Gender Perspective. Journal of Moral Education 16 (3):189-203.
A. Catherine McCabe, Rhea Ingram & Mary Conway Dato-on (2006). The Business of Ethics and Gender. Journal of Business Ethics 64 (2):101 - 116.
Derek Dalton & Marc Ortegren (2011). Gender Differences in Ethics Research: The Importance of Controlling for the Social Desirability Response Bias. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 103 (1):73-93.
Robyn Bluhm (2013). New Research, Old Problems: Methodological and Ethical Issues in fMRI Research Examining Sex/Gender Differences in Emotion Processing. Neuroethics 6 (2):319-330.
John H. Barnett & Marvin J. Karson (1989). Managers, Values, and Executive Decisions: An Exploration of the Role of Gender, Career Stage, Organizational Level, Function, and the Importance of Ethics, Relationships and Results in Managerial Decision-Making. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 8 (10):747 - 771.
Julie A. Nelson (1992). Thinking About Gender. Hypatia 7 (3):138 - 154.
Lucinda Joy Peach (2002). Social Responsibility, Sex Change, and Salvation: Gender Justice in the "Lotus Sūtra". Philosophy East and West 52 (1):50-74.
Nikala Lane & Andrew Crane (2002). Revisiting Gender Role Stereotyping in the Sales Profession. Journal of Business Ethics 40 (2):121 - 132.
Albert W. Musschenga (2005). Empirical Ethics, Context-Sensitivity, and Contextualism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (5):467 – 490.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads5 ( #234,882 of 1,100,083 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #190,060 of 1,100,083 )
How can I increase my downloads?