Graduate studies at Western
Cognitive Science Quarterly 1 (2):147-170 (2000)
|Abstract||It will always remain a remarkable phenomenon in the history of philosophy, that there was a time, when even mathematicians, who at the same time were philosophers, began to doubt, not of the accuracy of their geometrical propositions so far as they concerned space, but of their objective validity and the applicability of this concept itself, and of all its corollaries, to nature. They showed much concern whether a line in nature might not consist of physical points, and consequently that true space in the object might consist of simple [discrete] parts, while the space which the geometer has in his mind [being continuous] cannot be such|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John Haugeland (1981). Analog and Analog. Philosophical Topics 12 (1):213-226.
Bruce J. MacLennan (1994). Words Lie in Our Way. Minds and Machines 4 (4):421-37.
Matthew Katz (2008). Analog and Digital Representation. Minds and Machines 18 (3):403-408.
Russell Trenholme (1994). Analog Simulation. Philosophy of Science 61 (1):115-131.
Rahul Sarpeshkar (1998). Analog Versus Digital: Extrapolating From Electronics to Neurobiology. Neural Computation 10 (7):1601--1638.
Corey J. Maley (2011). Analog and Digital, Continuous and Discrete. Philosophical Studies 155 (1):117-131.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads113 ( #6,113 of 722,946 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #17,055 of 722,946 )
How can I increase my downloads?