Method and Metaphysics in Clements's and Gleason's Ecological Explanations
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 38 (1):85-109 (2007)
| Abstract | To generate explanatory theory, ecologists must wrestle with how to represent the extremely many, diverse causes behind phenomena in their domain. Early twentieth-century plant ecologists Frederic E. Clements and Henry A. Gleason provide a textbook example of different approaches to explaining vegetation, with Clements allegedly committed, despite abundant exceptions, to a law of vegetation, and Gleason denying the law in favor of less organized phenomena. However, examining Clements's approach to explanation reveals him not to be expressing a law, and instead to be developing an explanatory structure without laws, capable of progressively integrating causal complexity. Moreover, Clements and Gleason largely agree on the causes of vegetation; but, since causal understanding here underdetermines representation, they differ on how to integrate recognized causes into general theory---that is, in their methodologies. Observers of the case may have mistakenly assumed that scientific representation across the disciplines typically aims at laws like Newton's, and that representations always reveal scientists' metaphysical commitments. Ironically, in the present case, this assumption seems to have been made even by observers who regard Clements as naı¨ve for his alleged commitment to an ecological law. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesFred Richman (2000). Gleason's Theorem has a Constructive Proof. Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (4):425-431.
Colleen Clements (1979). Death and Philosophical Diversions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 39 (4):524-536.
Gregory M. Mikkelson (2003). Ecological Kinds and Ecological Laws. Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1390-1400.
Joseph Clements (1910). Björklund's “Death and Resurrection”. The Monist 20 (4):630-632.
Rebecca Schweder (2005). A Defense of a Unificationist Theory of Explanation. Foundations of Science 10 (4).
Colleen D. Clements (1976). Stasis: The Unnatural Value. Ethics 86 (2):136-144.
Millard Clements (1964). Mythology and Psychological Presupposition. Educational Theory 14 (3):224-228.
Millard Clements (1963). Three Observations About Language. Educational Theory 13 (2):149-154.
Helen Billinge (1997). A Constructive Formulation of Gleason's Theorem. Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (6):661-670.
Jani Raerinne (2011). Causal and Mechanistic Explanations in Ecology. Acta Biotheoretica 59 (3):251-271.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-03-15Total downloads9 ( #114,013 of 549,068 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,068 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
