Graduate studies at Western
Ethics and Information Technology 11 (2):145-153 (2009)
|Abstract||Information theorists often construe new Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) as leveling mechanisms, regulating power relations at a distance by arming stakeholders with information and enhanced agency. Management theorists have claimed that transparency cultivates stakeholder trust, distinguishes a business from its competition, and attracts new clients, investors, and employees, making it key to future growth and prosperity. Synthesizing these claims, we encounter an increasingly common view: If corporations voluntarily adopted new ICTs in order to foster transparency, trust, and growth, while embracing the redistributions of power they bring about, both corporations and stakeholders would benefit. The common view is short-sighted, however. In order to realize mutual benefit, transparency can not be conceived merely as efficient or economical. The implementation and use of new ICTs will be morally unsatisfactory unless they stably protect stakeholders. Moreover, without such protections, transparency is unlikely to produce lasting trust and growth. More specifically, corporate disclosures ought to be guided by a theory of stakeholder rights to know about threats or risks to stakeholders’ basic interests. Such rights are necessary moral protections for stakeholders in any business environment. Respect for transparency rights is not simply value added to a corporation’s line of goods and services, but a condition of a corporation’s justifiable claim to create value rather than harm, wrong, or injustice in its dealings.|
|Keywords||Corporations ICT Right to know Technology Transparency Trust|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alessandro Zattoni (2011). Who Should Control a Corporation? Toward a Contingency Stakeholder Model for Allocating Ownership Rights. Journal of Business Ethics 103 (2):255-274.
Robert Audi (2008). Some Dimensions of Trust in Business Practices: From Financial and Product Representation to Licensure and Voting. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 80 (1):97 - 102.
James C. Gaa (2009). Corporate Governance and the Responsibility of the Board of Directors for Strategic Financial Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics 90 (2):179 - 197.
Armando Menéndez-Viso (2009). Black and White Transparency: Contradictions of a Moral Metaphor. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 11 (2):155-162.
Matteo Turilli & Luciano Floridi (2009). The Ethics of Information Transparency. Ethics and Information Technology 11 (2):105-112.
Tessa Hebb (2006). The Economic Inefficiency of Secrecy: Pension Fund Investors' Corporate Transparency Concerns. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 63 (4):385 - 405.
Judith Simon (2010). The Entanglement of Trust and Knowledge on the Web. Ethics and Information Technology 2010 (12):343-355.
Lucas Introna & Athanasia Pouloudi (1999). Privacy in the Information Age: Stakeholders, Interests and Values. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 22 (1):27 - 38.
Michelle Greenwood & I. I. I. Buren (2010). Trust and Stakeholder Theory: Trustworthiness in the Organisation–Stakeholder Relationship. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 95 (3):425-438.
Antonino Vaccaro & Peter Madsen (2009). Corporate Dynamic Transparency: The New Ict-Driven Ethics? [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 11 (2):113-122.
Added to index2009-04-20
Total downloads17 ( #78,143 of 739,396 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,396 )
How can I increase my downloads?