David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 25 (1):81 – 93 (1982)
Environmentalists express concern at the destruction/exploitation of areas of the natural environment because they believe that those areas are of intrinsic value. An emerging response is to argue that natural areas may have their value restored by means of the techniques of environmental engineering. It is then claimed that the concern of environmentalists is irrational, merely emotional or even straightforwardly selfish. This essay argues that there is a dimension of value attaching to the natural environment which cannot be restored no matter how technologically proficient environmental engineers become. The argument involves highlighting and discussing analogies between faking art and faking nature. The pivot of the argument is the claim that genesis is a significant determinant of an area's value
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Helena Siipi (2008). Dimensions of Naturalness. Ethics and the Environment 13 (1):pp. 71-103.
Craig DeLancey (2012). An Ecological Concept of Wilderness. Ethics and the Environment 17 (1):25-44.
Helena Siipi (2011). Non-Backward-Looking Naturalness as an Environmental Value. Ethics, Policy and Environment 14 (3):329 - 344.
Avner Shalit (1994). Urban Preservation and the Judgment of Solomon. Journal of Applied Philosophy 11 (1):3-13.
John Basl & Ronald Sandler (2013). The Good of Non-Sentient Entities: Organisms, Artifacts, and Synthetic Biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (4):697-705.
Similar books and articles
Don Mannison (1983). Ii. Nature May Be of No Value: A Reply to Elliot. Inquiry 26 (2):233 – 235.
Yeuk-Sze Lo (1999). Natural and Artifactual: Restored Nature as Subject. Environmental Ethics 21 (3):247-266.
Robert Kirkman (2000). Robert Elliott, Faking Nature: The Ethics of Environmental Restoration. [REVIEW] Journal of Value Inquiry 34 (1):129-133.
William Throop (1999). Faking Nature. Environmental Ethics 21 (3):329-332.
Glenn Deliège (2010). The Cinquefoil Controversy. Environmental Ethics 32 (1):17-32.
Dario Cvencek, Anthony S. Brown, Nicola S. Gray & Robert J. Snowden, Faking of the Implicit Association Test Is Statistically Detectable and Partly Correctable.
Robert Elliot (1983). Ii. The Value of Wild Nature. Inquiry 26 (3):359 – 361.
Zev M. Trachtenberg (2005). William Ian Miller, Faking It:Faking It. Ethics 116 (1):247-250.
J. Thompson (2001). Faking Nature: The Ethics of Environmental Restoration. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (2):290 – 291.
Added to index2009-01-30
Total downloads143 ( #5,549 of 1,101,125 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #22,982 of 1,101,125 )
How can I increase my downloads?