David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sophia 50 (1):135-139 (2011)
A theory of morality acceptable to humanists must be one that can be accepted independently of religion. In this paper, I argue that while there is such a theory, it is a non-standard one, and its acceptance would have some far-reaching consequences. As one might expect, the theory is similar to others in various ways. But it is not the same as any of them. Indeed, it is a radically new theory. Like Hume’s ethics, it is founded on our natural sociability, and feelings of empathy for others. Like Aristotle’s theory, it incorporates an ethics of virtue. Like Kant’s theory, it regards the set of moral principles as those appropriate for a socially ideal society. But unlike Kant’s theory, it is essentially utilitarian. I call it ‘social contractual utilitarianism’
|Keywords||Humanism Secularism Social policy De facto social contracts Social contractual utilitarianism Morals as social ideals Eudaimonia Non-dominance theories of morality Individual Collective social agents|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John Stuart Mill (1962). Utilitarianism. Cleveland, World Pub. Co..
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
J. B. Schneewind (2010). Essays on the History of Moral Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Robert Audi (2007). Divine Command Morality and the Autonomy of Ethics. Faith and Philosophy 24 (2):121-143.
Michael A. Slote (2010). Selected Essays. Oxford University Press.
Ronald A. Lindsay (2005). Slaves, Embryos, and Nonhuman Animals: Moral Status and the Limitations of Common Morality Theory. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (4):323-346.
J. McKenzie Alexander (2007). The Structural Evolution of Morality. Cambridge University Press.
Jens Timmermann (2005). Why Kant Could Not Have Been a Utilitarian. Utilitas 17 (3):243-264.
James Gordon Finlayson (2000). Modernity and Morality in Habermas's Discourse Ethics. Inquiry 43 (3):319 – 340.
Ernest Wallwork (1985). Sentiment and Structure: A Durkheimian Critique of Kohlberg's Moral Theory. Journal of Moral Education 14 (2):87-101.
Jim Herrick (2003/2005). Humanism: An Introduction. Prometheus Books.
Robert B. Louden (1992). Morality and Moral Theory: A Reappraisal and Reaffirmation. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2010-03-31
Total downloads35 ( #48,390 of 1,098,785 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #79,088 of 1,098,785 )
How can I increase my downloads?