Inquiry 26 (3):359 – 361 (1983)
|Abstract||Don Mannison levels three criticisms at the claims I make in ?Faking Nature?. First, he claims that I argue from (1) X is valued to (2) X has value. I do not. Second, he criticizes an argument of Nelson Goodman's to which I allude. While his criticism has point he misrepresents the role I assign to Goodman's argument. Third, he suggests that there is no need for me to count environmental evaluations as evaluations of the moral kind. However, he offers no account of why I should not and ignores an important consideration that requires that I should|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ernest Partridge (1984). Nature as a Moral Resource. Environmental Ethics 6 (2):101-130.
Robert Elliot (1982). Faking Nature. Inquiry 25 (1):81 – 93.
Roger J. H. King (2003). Toward an Ethics of the Domesticated Environment. Philosophy and Geography 6 (1):3 – 14.
Kenneth H. Simonsen (1981). The Value of Wildness. Environmental Ethics 3 (3):259-263.
Eileen O'Rourke (2000). The Reintroduction and Reinterpretation of the Wild. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 (1):144-165.
Martin Drenthen (2009). Fatal Attraction. Wildnes in Contemporary Film. Environmental Ethics 31 (3):297-315.
Irene Klaver, Jozef Keulartz & Henk van den Belt (2002). Born to Be Wild. Environmental Ethics 24 (1):3-21.
Henk van den Belt (2002). Born to Be Wild. Environmental Ethics 24 (1):3-21.
Roger J. H. King (2003). The Place of Domesticated Spaces in Environmental Ethics. Social Philosophy Today 19:41-53.
Added to index2009-01-30
Total downloads9 ( #114,063 of 549,087 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,087 )
How can I increase my downloads?