David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Robert Proctor has argued that ignorance or non-knowledge can be fruitfully divided into at least three categories: (1) ignorance as native state or starting point; (2) ignorance as lost realm or selective choice; and (3) ignorance as strategic ploy or active construct. This chapter explores Proctor’s second category, ignorance as selective choice. When scientists investigate poorly understood phenomena, they have to make selective choices about what questions to ask, what research strategies and metrics to employ, and what language to use for describing the phenomena. This chapter focuses especially on the selective choice of language for describing and categorizing phenomena in the face of uncertainty. Using several case studies from recent pollution research, I show that linguistic choices are especially significant when we have severely limited knowledge, because those choices can emphasize and highlight some aspects of our limited knowledge rather than others. These selective emphases can in turn influence societal decision making, and they can exacerbate the selectivity of our knowledge by further steering scientific research in some directions rather than others. I conclude with some suggestions for developing scientific language in socially responsible ways, even in the face of significant ignorance and uncertainty.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Stuart Firestein (2012). Ignorance: How It Drives Science. Oxford University Press.
Michael J. Zimmerman (2008). Living with Uncertainty: The Moral Significance of Ignorance. Cambridge University Press.
Pierre Le Morvan (2011). On Ignorance: A Reply to Peels. Philosophia 39 (2):335-344.
L. L. Farrar (2003). In Praise of Ignorance. Critical Review 15 (3-4):339-346.
Nancy Tuana (2006). The Speculum of Ignorance: The Women's Health Movement and Epistemologies of Ignorance. Hypatia 21 (3):1-19.
Cynthia Townley (2006). Toward a Revaluation of Ignorance. Hypatia 21 (3):37 - 55.
Rik Peels (2010). What is Ignorance? Philosophia 38 (1):57-67.
Pierre le Morvan (2011). Knowledge, Ignorance and True Belief. Theoria 77 (1):32-41.
Nancy Tuana (2004). Coming to Understand: Orgasm and the Epistemology of Ignorance. Hypatia 19 (1):194-232.
Robert Fiengo (2007). Asking Questions: Using Meaningful Structures to Imply Ignorance. Oxford ;University Press.
Erinn Gilson (2011). Vulnerability, Ignorance, and Oppression. Hypatia 26 (2):308-332.
Thom Baguley & S. Ian Robertson (2000). Where Does Fast and Frugal Cognition Stop? The Boundary Between Complex Cognition and Simple Heuristics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):742-743.
Pierre Le Morvan (2013). Why the Standard View of Ignorance Prevails. Philosophia 41 (1):239-256.
Danielle A. Layne (2009). In Praise of the Mere Presence of Ignorance. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:253-267.
Lorraine Code (2004). The Power Of Ignorance. Philosophical Papers 33 (3):291-308.
Added to index2010-12-12
Total downloads19 ( #98,939 of 1,410,166 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #155,015 of 1,410,166 )
How can I increase my downloads?