David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Australasian Journal of Philosophy 49 (2):177 – 203 (1971)
This paper is a response to the "panel discussion of simultaneity by slow clock transport in the special and general theories of relativity" ("philosophy of science", 36, (march, 1969), Pp. 1-81) which arose out of a paper by brian ellis and peter bowman on "conventionality in distant simultaneity", ("philosophy of science", 34, (june, 1967), Pp. 116-36). It is argued that the basic disagreement between the pittsburgh panel and us is an epistemological one. In particular, Our concept of a good physical reason is radically different from the pittsburgh panel's. For us the known existence of a number of concordant, Isotropic, And logically independent criteria for distant simultaneity, And the non-Existence of any known discordant but isotropic criteria for distant simultaneity is a good physical reason for choosing one of these criteria. For the pittsburgh panel it is not
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Brian Ellis (1963). Universal and Differential Forces. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 14 (55):177-194.
Brian Ellis & Peter Bowman (1967). Conventionality in Distant Simulataneity. Philosophy of Science 34 (2):116-136.
Adolf Grünbaum (1964). Is a Universal Nocturnal Expansion Falsifiable or Physically Vacuous? Philosophical Studies 15 (5):71 - 79.
Adolf Grünbaum (1969). Simultaneity by Slow Clock Transport in the Special Theory of Relativity. Philosophy of Science 36 (1):5-43.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Bas C. Van Fraassen (1969). Conventionality in the Axiomatic Foundations of the Special Theory of Relativity. Philosophy of Science 36 (1):64 - 73.
David Malament (1977). Causal Theories of Time and the Conventionality of Simultaneity. Noûs 11 (3):293-300.
John A. Winnie (1970). Special Relativity Without One-Way Velocity Assumptions: Part I. Philosophy of Science 37 (1):81-99.
John A. Winnie (1970). Special Relativity Without One-Way Velocity Assumptions: Part II. Philosophy of Science 37 (2):223-238.
Mark Zangari (1994). A New Twist in the Conventionality of Simultaneity Debate. Philosophy of Science 61 (2):267-275.
Frank Jackson & Robert Pargetter (1977). Relative Simultaneity in the Special Relativity. Philosophy of Science 44 (3):464-474.
Dennis Dieks (2010). Reichenbach and the Conventionality of Distant Simultaneity in Perspective. In. In Thomas Uebel, Stephan Hartmann, Wenceslao Gonzalez, Marcel Weber, Dennis Dieks & Friedrich Stadler (eds.), The Present Situation in the Philosophy of Science. Springer. 315--333.
Vesselin Petkov (1989). Simultaneity, Conventionality and Existence. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (1):69-76.
Adolf Grünbaum (2010). David Malament and the Conventionality of Simultaneity: A Reply. [REVIEW] Foundations of Physics 40 (9-10):1285-1297.
Laurent A. Beauregard (1976). The Sui Generis Conventionality of Simultaneity. Philosophy of Science 43 (4):469-490.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #126,854 of 1,098,955 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #175,054 of 1,098,955 )
How can I increase my downloads?