Rights‐based reasoning in discussions about lesbian and gay issues: implications for moral educators
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Moral Education 33 (1):71-86 (2004)
Despite a paucity of psychological research exploring the interface between lesbian and gay issues and human rights, a human rights framework has been widely adopted in debates to gain equality for lesbians and gay men. Given this prominence within political discourse of human rights as a framework for the promotion of positive social change for lesbians and gay men, the aim of this study was to explore the extent to which rights?based arguments are employed when talking about lesbian and gay issues in a social context. An analysis of six focus group discussions with students showed that when lesbian and gay issues are discussed, rights?based reasoning is employed intermittently, and in relation to certain issues more so than others. The implications of these findings for moral education aimed at promoting positive social change for lesbians and gay men are discussed
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Sonja J. Ellis (2002). Moral Reasoning and Homosexuality: The Acceptability of Arguments About Lesbian and Gay Issues. Journal of Moral Education 31 (4):455-467.
Mark Blasius & Shane Phelan (eds.) (1997). We Are Everywhere: A Historical Sourcebook of Gay and Lesbian Politics. Routledge.
Damien W. Riggs (2007). Reassessing the Foster-Care System: Examining the Impact of Heterosexism on Lesbian and Gay Applicants. Hypatia 22 (1):132-148.
Chris Cuomo (2007). Dignity and the Right to Be Lesbian or Gay. Philosophical Studies 132 (1):75 - 85.
Cheshire Calhoun (2002). Feminism, the Family, and the Politics of the Closet: Lesbian and Gay Displacement. OUP Oxford.
Alan Sears (2005). Queer Anti-Capitalism: What's Left of Lesbian and Gay Liberation? Science and Society 69 (1):92 - 112.
Peg O'Connor (2006). Swimming Against the Mainstream Gay and Lesbian Agenda. Radical Philosophy Today 3:83-89.
Andy Wible (2006). Richard D. Mohr, The Long Arc of Justice: Lesbian and Gay Marriage, Equality, and Rights:The Long Arc of Justice: Lesbian and Gay Marriage, Equality, and Rights. Ethics 116 (3):604-607.
Claudia Card (1996). Against Marriage and Motherhood. Hypatia 11 (3):1 - 23.
Gary Hicks & Hillary Warren (1998). Whose Benefit? Gay and Lesbian Journalists Discuss Outing, the Individual, and the Community. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 13 (1):14 – 25.
Bryan J. McCann (2011). Queering Expertise: Counterpublics, Social Change, and the Corporeal Dilemmas of LGBTQ Equality. Social Epistemology 25 (3):249 - 262.
M. Katherine B. Darmer, 'Activist Courts,' Misleading Wedge Politics and the Tragedy of Proposition.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads8 ( #168,674 of 1,099,034 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #114,795 of 1,099,034 )
How can I increase my downloads?