The rules of insanity: commentary on: psychopathic disorder: a category mistake?

Journal of Medical Ethics 17 (2):89-90 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper addresses Colin Holmes's suggestion that the psychopathic disorder is best regarded not as a psychiatric concept, but as an ethical one. The paper argues that the concept of psychopathy, like many other concepts, can span both psychiatry and ethics, and that it is not clear what removing if from the realm of psychiatry would entail. Also, the question of whether the concept of psychopathy is useful for psychiatrists must be separated from the question of whether psychopaths should be exonerated from the moral and legal responsibility for their actions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Psychopathic disorder: a category mistake?C. A. Holmes - 1991 - Journal of Medical Ethics 17 (2):77-85.
The mad, the bad, and the psychopath.Heidi L. Maibom - 2008 - Neuroethics 1 (3):167-184.
Professor Ryle's category-mistake.Albert Hofstadter - 1951 - Journal of Philosophy 48 (April):257-269.
Moral insanity and practical reason.Carl Elliott & Grant Gillett - 1992 - Philosophical Psychology 5 (1):53 – 67.
Beyond Rational Insanity.Hung-Yul So - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:221-227.
Perceptual events, states, and processes.Charles Mason Myers - 1962 - Philosophy of Science 29 (July):285-291.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
45 (#337,378)

6 months
7 (#350,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Carl Elliott
University of Minnesota

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references