David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy East and West 62 (3):375-391 (2012)
The Five Relationships are commonly held to be fundamental to Confucian thought and, according to some scholars, constitute the basis of all human relationships. This essay examines how the ruler-minister relationship served as a site over a debate about the political importance of virtue in early Chinese philosophy. Some early texts, including the Confucian texts Mengzi and Xunzi, argue that virtue confers a different status that rulers should recognize by treating the virtuous as equals or even superiors. In particular, these texts claim that teachers and worthies are not ministers, and thus do not fit the rulerminister paradigm. Other texts, such as the Han Feizi and Guanzi, argue against this position, denying that virtue is relevant to political status. They claim that the ruler is superior to all, and that it is dangerous to grant special status based on moral qualities. The texts that adhere most closely to the Five Relationships are actually those considered Legalist, not Confucian. Thus, reexamining the Five Relationships is a way to throw light on the contested status of the morally worthy in early Chinese social and political thought
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jana S. Rošker (2015). Modern Confucianism and Chinese Theories of Modernization. Philosophy Compass 10 (8):510-522.
Similar books and articles
Stephanie Feeney (2005). Ethics and the Early Childhood Educator: Using the Naeyc Code. National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Kwong-loi Shun (1997). Mencius and Early Chinese Thought. Stanford University Press.
Bryan Cunningham (ed.) (2008). Exploring Professionalism. Institute of Education, University of London.
Franklin M. Doeringer (1990). Unto the Mountain: Toward a Paradigm for Early Chinese Thought. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 17 (2):135-156.
Bret Hinsch (1995). Harmony (He) and Gender in Early Chinese Thought. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 22 (2):109-128.
Franklin M. Doeringer (1993). Imaging the Imageless: Symbol and Perception in Early Chinese Thought. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 20 (1):5-27.
John B. Bennett (1998). Collegial Professionalism: The Academy, Individualism, and the Common Good. Oryx Press.
William L. Fibkins (2006). Innocence Denied: A Guide to Preventing Sexual Misconduct by Teachers and Coaches. Rowman & Littlefield Education.
Edward Slingerland (2011). Metaphor and Meaning in Early China. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10 (1):1-30.
Carl M. Johnson (2012). Computation and Early Chinese Thought. Asian Philosophy 22 (2):143-159.
Jiang Linchang (2008). The Chu Bamboo Slip Comments on the Poetry (Shilun): A Perspective of the Early History of the Study of Chinese Classics. Contemporary Chinese Thought 39 (4):70-77.
Chris Fraser (2011). Knowledge and Error in Early Chinese Thought. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10 (2):127-148.
Brian Bruya (2003). Review of Geaney's On the Epistemology of the Senses in Early Chinese Thought. [REVIEW] China Review International 10 (1):157-164.
Iram Siraj-Blatchford (1993). Educational Research and Reform: Some Implications for the Professional Identity of Early Years Teachers. British Journal of Educational Studies 41 (4):393 - 408.
Added to index2012-08-06
Total downloads6 ( #480,540 of 1,911,917 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #459,829 of 1,911,917 )
How can I increase my downloads?