Reply to comments
Inquiry 29 (1-4):65 – 77 (1986)
| Abstract | The main theme in most of the contributions to the symposium on Making Sense of Marx is methodological individualism. In the first part of my reply I consider the objections raised to this, in my opinion, trivially true doctrine. Against Taylor I argue that social relations, seen in abstraction from their relata, have no causal efficacy. Against Wood I argue that my defence of methodological individualism and my criticism of functional explanation are less closely related than he makes them out to be. Against Slaughter I argue that he holds two inconsistent views on the importance of individual desires and beliefs in social explanation. Against Meikle I argue that his view that entities are ?real natures? with a normal path of development needs to be restated in terms of dynamically stable processes. In the second part of the reply I deal with the individual contributions one by one. The replies to the ?fundamentalist Marxists? Slaughter and Meikle are relatively brief, because of the dismissive, unscholarly nature of their comments. Similarly I do not have much to say to North and Taylor, whose brief comments do not contain much with which to disagree. I reply at greater length to Wood, conceding the point he makes in the last section of his comment but rejecting his argument concerning functional explanation | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Walter Ott (2009). Remarks on McCormick's Comments. Philosophia 37 (3).
W. Suchting (1978). I. Rising Up From Downunder: Comments on Feyerabend's 'Marxist Fairytales From Australia'. Inquiry 21 (1-4):337 – 347.
Joseph Raz (2003). The Practice of Value - Reply. In Jay Wallace (ed.), The Practice of Value. Oxford University Press.
Jon Elster (1980). Vii. Reply to Comments. Inquiry 23 (2):213 – 232.
Hilary Putnam (1964). Comments on Comments on Comments: A Reply to Margenau and Wigner. Philosophy of Science 31 (1):1-6.
Cliff Slaughter (1986). Making Sense of Elster. Inquiry 29 (1-4):45 – 56.
Michael Taylor (1986). Elster's Marx. Inquiry 29 (1-4):3 – 10.
Justin Schwartz (1993). Functional Explanation and Metaphysical Individualism. Philosophy of Science 60 (2):278-301.
Allen W. Wood (1986). Historical Materialism and Functional Explanation. Inquiry 29 (1-4):11 – 27.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-30Total downloads3 ( #202,107 of 549,694 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |

