Reexamining the expected effect of available resources and firm size on firm environmental orientation: An empirical study of UK firms
Journal of Business Ethics 65 (3):297 - 308 (2006)
|Abstract||An emergent body of literature examined why some firms apply some environmental initiatives while other firms do not take responsibility for their natural environment? Thus, firm environmental orientation (responsiveness and performance) are linked in the literature to several variables. Unfortunately, the relationship between firm environmental orientation and either available resources or firm size showed mixed results and inconclusive evidence. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to show empirically how available resources and firm size can explain differences in firm environmental responsiveness and environmental performance. Econometric results of environmental responsiveness using the logistic regression model demonstrated that firm size does appear to add something unique in explaining differences in environmental responsiveness while available resource can be safely dropped from the model. However, econometric analysis of environmental performance using the maximum-likelihood random effects model showed strong evidence that available resources and firm size are significant predictors of firm environmental performance.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Bulent Menguc, Seigyoung Auh & Lucie Ozanne (forthcoming). The Interactive Effect of Internal and External Factors on a Proactive Environmental Strategy and its Influence on a Firm's Performance. Journal of Business Ethics.
Louis H. Amato & Christie H. Amato (2012). Retail Philanthropy: Firm Size, Industry, and Business Cycle. Journal of Business Ethics 107 (4):435-448.
Subodh P. Kulkarni (2000). Environmental Ethics and Information Asymmetry Among Organizational Stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics 28 (4).
Donald Neubaum, Marie Mitchell & Marshall Schminke (2004). Firm Newness, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Ethical Climate. Journal of Business Ethics 52 (4).
Alan K. Reichert, Marion S. Webb & Edward G. Thomas (2000). Corporate Support for Ethical and Environmental Policies: A Financial Management Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 25 (1):53 - 64.
Irene Goll & Abdul A. Rasheed (2004). The Moderating Effect of Environmental Munificence and Dynamism on the Relationship Between Discretionary Social Responsibility and Firm Performance. Journal of Business Ethics 49 (1):41-54.
Marc Orlitzky (2001). Does Firm Size Comfound the Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Firm Financial Performance? Journal of Business Ethics 33 (2):167 - 180.
A. Salama, K. Anderson & J. S. Toms (2011). Does Community and Environmental Responsibility Affect Firm Risk? Evidence From UK Panel Data 1994–2006. Business Ethics 20 (2):192-204.
Elena Fraj-Andrés, Eva Martinez-Salinas & Jorge Matute-Vallejo (2009). A Multidimensional Approach to the Influence of Environmental Marketing and Orientation on the Firm's Organizational Performance. Journal of Business Ethics 88 (2):263 - 286.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #180,404 of 556,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )
How can I increase my downloads?