Graduate studies at Western
Inquiry 23 (2):213 – 232 (1980)
|Abstract||I am most grateful that the Editor of Inquiry has invited these scholars to comment upon my Logic and Society (hereafter LS). The symposiasts have acutely singled out a number of statements in my book that are wrong, incomplete or ambiguous. They also provide important further suggestions, supplementing my own ideas in fertile ways. And at times they fail to understand what I was trying to do, or they advance objections that I cannot accept. I shall first react to a general point raised in several of the papers, and then deal with each paper in turn.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David Papineau, Reply to Robert Kirk's and Andrew Melnyk's Comments on My "Thinking About Consciousness".
Karl Egil Aubert (1983). Ii. Mathematical Modelling of Election Predictions: Comments to Simon 's Reply. Inquiry 26 (1):132 – 134.
Walter Ott (2009). Remarks on McCormick's Comments. Philosophia 37 (3):475-476.
Daniel E. Flage (2009). Remarks on Grandi's Comments. Philosophia 37 (3):379-380.
John F. Post (2004). Reply to Gale and Pruss. Philo 7 (1):114-121.
Hilary Putnam (1964). Comments on Comments on Comments: A Reply to Margenau and Wigner. Philosophy of Science 31 (1):1-6.
Jon Elster (1986). Reply to Comments. Inquiry 29 (1-4):65 – 77.
W. Suchting (1978). I. Rising Up From Downunder: Comments on Feyerabend's 'Marxist Fairytales From Australia'. Inquiry 21 (1-4):337 – 347.
Added to index2009-03-05
Total downloads2 ( #246,187 of 734,603 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 734,603 )
How can I increase my downloads?