David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 17 (11):1129-1144 (1998)
This paper offers a new concept of the firm that aims at balancing the corporate economic, social, and environmental responsibilities and goes beyond the stakeholder approach. It intends to provide a conceptual and operationalizable basis to fairly assess corporate conduct from both inside and outside the companies. To a large extent these different responsibilities may overlap and reinforce each other. However, if they conflict, they should be clearly evaluated for their own sake and in terms of wealth creation. Only then can a balanced approach be realized. Section 1 briefly discusses some general aspects of the relationship between concepts and measurement. In Section 2, a concept of the firm is developed that is based on the notion of responsibility and balances economic, social and environmental responsibilities. According to these concepts, different ways of measuring corporate planning and performance are examined in Section 3, followed up by a summary and conclusions.
|Keywords||Philosophy Ethics Business Education Economic Growth Management|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Yuan-Shuh Lii & Monle Lee (2012). Doing Right Leads to Doing Well: When the Type of CSR and Reputation Interact to Affect Consumer Evaluations of the Firm. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 105 (1):69-81.
Lucio Lamberti & Emanuele Lettieri (2009). Csr Practices and Corporate Strategy: Evidence From a Longitudinal Case Study. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 87 (2):153 - 168.
Georges Enderle (2004). Global Competition and Corporate Responsibilities of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Business Ethics 13 (1):50–63.
Antonino Vaccaro & Dalia Patiño Echeverri (2010). Corporate Transparency and Green Management. Journal of Business Ethics 95 (3):487 - 506.
Antonino Vaccaro & Dalia Patiño Echeverri (2010). Corporate Transparency and Green Management. Journal of Business Ethics 95 (3):487-506.
Similar books and articles
Irene Goll & Abdul A. Rasheed (2004). The Moderating Effect of Environmental Munificence and Dynamism on the Relationship Between Discretionary Social Responsibility and Firm Performance. Journal of Business Ethics 49 (1):41-54.
Georges Enderle (2001). Integrating the Ethical Dimension Into the Analytical Framework for the Reform of State-Owned Enterprises in China's Socialist Market Economy: A Proposal. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 30 (3):261 - 275.
Jeremy Galbreath (2006). Are Organisation Researchers Too Obsessed with the Economic Responsibility of the Firm? Journal of Business Ethics 65 (3):287 - 295.
Sybille Sachs & Marc Maurer (2009). Toward Dynamic Corporate Stakeholder Responsibility: From Corporate Social Responsibility Toward a Comprehensive and Dynamic View of Corporate Stakeholder Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (3):535 - 544.
A. Salama, K. Anderson & J. S. Toms (2011). Does Community and Environmental Responsibility Affect Firm Risk? Evidence From UK Panel Data 1994–2006. Business Ethics 20 (2):192-204.
Sybille Sachs & Marc Maurer (2009). Toward Dynamic Corporate Stakeholder Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (3):535-544.
Marc Orlitzky (2001). Does Firm Size Comfound the Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Firm Financial Performance? Journal of Business Ethics 33 (2):167 - 180.
Bryan W. Husted & David B. Allen (2007). Corporate Social Strategy in Multinational Enterprises: Antecedents and Value Creation. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 74 (4):345 - 361.
Khaled Elsayed (2006). Reexamining the Expected Effect of Available Resources and Firm Size on Firm Environmental Orientation: An Empirical Study of UK Firms. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 65 (3):297 - 308.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #122,451 of 1,781,359 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #108,202 of 1,781,359 )
How can I increase my downloads?